Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 7;14(21):6702. doi: 10.3390/ma14216702

Table 2.

The experimental and theoretical MAC by XCOM program as well as the relative deviation between the two results.

Clay Type Nuclide Energy (MeV) MAC (cm2.g−1) R.D (∆%)
XCOM Experimental
red clay Am (241) 0.060 0.352 0.346 ± 0.006 1.55
Cs (137) 0.662 0.076 0.077 ± 0.007 −2.01
Co (60) 1.172 0.058 0.056 ± 0.001 1.95
1.333 0.054 0.053 ± 0.005 0.98
ball clay Am (241) 0.060 0.287 0.282 ± 0.006 1.54
Cs (137) 0.662 0.077 0.076 ± 0.001 1.22
Co (60) 1.172 0.058 0.058 ± 0.005 −0.88
1.333 0.055 0.054 ± 0.004 1.11
kaolin clay Am (241) 0.060 0.276 0.270 ± 0.005 2.05
Cs (137) 0.662 0.077 0.075 ± 0.005 1.95
Co (60) 1.172 0.058 0.059 ± 0.007 −2.85
1.333 0.055 0.054 ± 0.001 1.66
bentonite clay Am (241) 0.060 0.372 0.383 ± 0.006 −3.02
Cs (137) 0.662 0.077 0.078 ± 0.002 −1.55
Co (60) 1.172 0.058 0.057 ± 0.005 0.88
1.333 0.055 0.054 ± 0.006 0.78