Table 2.
The RMSE () comparison of three algorithms when IMUs on three subjects were bound in position 1.
Subject 1 | Subject 2 | Subject 3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWPSO | GWO | GN | DWPSO | GWO | GN | DWPSO | GWO | GN | |
8.65 | 9.09 | 9.36 | 10.63 | 10.97 | 11.05 | 8.17 | 9.65 | 11.90 | |
3.72 | 6.42 | 7.90 | 5.97 | 7.36 | 12.53 | 3.42 | 7.83 | 9.61 | |
4.53 | 5.13 | 5.26 | 3.29 | 4.15 | 4.69 | 5.71 | 6.08 | 6.86 | |
5.77 | 6.86 | 7.45 | 4.35 | 5.61 | 5.99 | 2.06 | 3.41 | 3.76 | |
1.12 | 3.42 | 5.02 | 6.01 | 7.86 | 10.34 | 4.98 | 6.93 | 9.28 | |
3.16 | 5.26 | 7.02 | 4.54 | 6.37 | 7.63 | 1.57 | 4.25 | 6.97 | |
4.03 | 5.69 | 7.36 | 3.81 | 4.08 | 6.62 | 5.43 | 8.62 | 9.45 | |
5.76 | 6.83 | 7.71 | 3.55 | 5.67 | 9.71 | 3.26 | 4.54 | 4.86 | |
21.05 | 23.07 | 23.45 | 25.41 | 26.06 | 26.83 | 20.25 | 21.79 | 23.67 |