TABLE 2.
Performances of the three typing methods tested with 40 unrelated isolates
| Typing method | Typeability (%) | Discriminatory power
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of types | DIa | ||
| Ribotyping with HaeIII | 75 | 30 | 0.94 |
| PCR-RFLP analysis by digestion of: | |||
| ureAB with HaeIII | 100 | 20 | 0.96 |
| ureAB with BamHI + HindIII | 100 | 7 | 0.71 |
| ureC with HaeIII + HindIII | 100 | 11 | 0.89 |
| ureC with Sau3A | 100 | 27 | 0.97 |
| RAPD analysis with: | |||
| Primer 1254 | 100 | 38 | 0.99 |
| Primer 1247 | 100 | 38 | 0.99 |
| Primer 1281 | 100 | 40 | 1 |
DI according to Hunter and Gaston (28).