Table 1.
Technique | Size Range | About | Advantage | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|---|---|
FTIR | >10 μm | Polymer identification | Easy, no sample preparation Non destructive |
Time consuming |
ATR-FTIR | >500 μm | Polymer identification | Easy, no sample preparation Non destructive |
Time consuming |
micro-FTIR | <20 μm | Polymer identification | Easy, no sample preparation Non destructive |
Time consuming |
IR-NMR | Polymer degradation | Identification of functional groups | Sample preparation Expensive |
|
Raman | >10 μm | Polymer identification | Non destructive | Time consuming |
Micro-Raman | >1 μm | Polymer identification | High resolution | Fluorescence interference |
TED-GC-MS | Polymer identification | Sample can be heterogeneous No sample preparation |
Destructive analysis | |
Optical microscopy | Size, color, morphology | Easy | No polymer characterization | |
SEM | Size, color, morphology | High resolution of images | Sample preparation | |
TEM | <0.1 nm | High resolution | Sample preparation Method in the early stage, no NPs have been detected |
|
TGA-DSC | Polymer and additives identification | Easy | Destructive analysis | |
HPLC | Polymer and additives identification | Highly sensitive | Long sample preparation | |
Stereo microscope | >100 μm | Shape, size, and colors | Fast | No polymer characterization |
Atomic force microscopy | >0.3 nm | Surface analysis | High resolution Polymer blend characterization |
Sample damage Combination with other technique is needed |
Fluorescence microscopy | Useful for transparent MNPs | Interference Use dye Pre-treatment |
||
Atomic force microscopy | 0.3 nm | Surface structure | High resolution | Possible contamination during the sample manipulation |
Pyrolysis GC-MS | Polymer identification | Highly sensitive in combination with TGA | Destructive analysis | |
Cytometry | >200 nm | Quantification in liquid sample | Fast | Interference Use dye Pre-treatment |