Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;16:666. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02767-x

Table 2.

Development of revision knee arthroplasty after unicondylar knee arthroplasty numbers

Years Revision unicondylar knee arthroplasty Relative to 2008 (%) Septic revisions Male patients Female patients Patients younger than 65 years Patients aged 65 years or older
2008 2123 70 (3.30%) 676 (31.84%) 1447 (68.16%) 726 (34.20%) 1397 (65.80%)
2009 2129 0.28 91 (4.27%) 803 (37.72%) 1326 (62.28%) 798 (37.48%) 1331 (62.52%)
2010 2188 3.06 85 (3.88%) 818 (37.39%) 1370 (62.61%) 914 (41.77%) 1274 (58.23%)
2011 2329 9.70 113 (4.85%) 873 (37.48%) 1456 (62.52%) 988 (42.42%) 1341 (57.58%)
2012 2595 22.23 124 (4.78%) 980 (37.76%) 1615 (62.24%) 1137 (43.82%) 1458 (56.18%)
2013 2460 15.87 119 (4.84%) 962 (39.11%) 1498 (60.89%) 1153 (46.87%) 1307 (53.13%)
2014 2537 19.50 142 (5.60%) 1010 (39.81%) 1527 (60.19%) 1176 (46.35%) 1361 (53.65%)
2015 2620 23.41 157 (5.99%) 1028 (39.24%) 1592 (60.76%) 1263 (48.21%) 1357 (51.79%)
2016 2783 31.09 160 (5.75%) 1106 (39.74%) 1677 (60.26%) 1374 (49.37%) 1409 (50.63%)
2017 3010 41.78 197 (6.54%) 1244 (41.33%) 1766 (58.67%) 1469 (48.80%) 1541 (51.20%)
2018 3105 46.26 177 (5.70%) 1275 (41.06%) 1830 (58.94%) 1484 (47.79%) 1621 (52.21%)