Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;12:755866. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.755866

Table 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between EMM patients and non-EMM patients in the two clinical trials conducted in our center.

Characteristics EMM (n = 25) non-EMM (n = 36) p-Value
Age, yr, median (range) 55 (34 - 70) 53 (34 - 69) 0.509
Sex, n (%) 0.353
Male 13 (52.0) 23 (63.9)
Female 12 (48.0) 13 (36.1)
ECOG performance-status score 1.000
0-1 23 (92.0) 34 (94.4)
2-3 2 (8.0) 2 (5.6)
Time since diagnosis, yr, median (range) 3.2 (0.8 - 12.6) 2.9 (0.7 - 11.3) 0.363
Prior lines of therapy, median (range) 4 (3 - 11) 4 (3 - 10) 0.114
Durie-Salmon stage, n (%) 0.145
I 1 (4.0) 0
II 0 3 (8.3)
III 22 (95.0) 33 (91.7)
ISS stage, n (%) 0.288
I 7 (30.0) 16 (44.4)
II 11 (48.0) 10 (27.8)
III 5 (22.0) 10 (27.8)
Myeloma type, n (%) 0.104
IgG κ 5 (20.0) 8 (22.2)
IgG λ 9 (36.0) 10 (27.8)
IgA κ 2 (8.0) 3 (8.3)
IgA λ 0 2 (5.6)
IgD λ 1 (4.0) 3 (8.3)
Light chain κ 0 6 (16.7)
Light chain λ 7 (28.0) 2 (5.6)
Non-secretor 1 (4.0) 2 (5.6)
High risk cytogenetics, n (%)& 6 (24.0) 18 (50.0) 0.041
TP 53 mutations, n (%) 3 (13.6) 3 (9.1) 0.674
BCMA MFI on plasma cells, median (range) 2417 (840 - 12516) 1586 (303 - 51023) 0.133
CAR-T structure, n (%) 0.192
Murine 18 (72.0) 20 (55.6)
Fully human 7 (28.0) 16 (44.4)

EMM, extramedullary myeloma; BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; DS, Durie Salmon; ISS, International Staging System; MFI, Mean Fluorescence Intensity.

&Cytogenetic features were measured using florescence in situ hybridization. The probes include t(4;14), Del(17p), 1q21, t(14;16), Del (13q), t(11;14) and. High risk cytogenetic features (any t(4;14), Del(17p), and t(14;16)) evaluated with conventional cytogenetics or fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH).