Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1801–E1810. doi: 10.1055/a-1526-1208

Table 4. Summary of the studies published as full papers reporting > 2 cases of EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed or not possible ERCP using the Axios stent in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Author (year) Study type No. of patients A × ios stents used Stent size (diameter × length) (mm) Mean CBD diameter (mm) Technical success (%) Clinical success (%) Mean Follow-up (days) AEs (number of cases, %)
“Hot” “Cold”
Brückner (2015) 10 RS, SC  5  3  2 6 × 8 in all 12.6 ± 3 5/5 1 (100) 5/5 (100) 9.8 ± 6.8 1/5 (20 %): stent dysfunction (1)
Anderloni (2016) 11 CS, SC  5 2  5  0 NR NR 5/5 (100) 5/5 (100) 7 NR
Kunda (2016) 9 RS, MC 57 30 27 6 × 8 in 36 17.9 (range 8–35) (median) 56/57 3 (98.2) 54/56 (96.4) 151 ± 145 8/56 (14.3 %): duodenal perforation (1); stent migration (1); intraprocedural bleeding (1); transient cholangitis (1); stent occlusion or dysfunction (4)
8 × 8 in 2
10 × 10 in 16
15 × 10 in 2
Anderloni (2018) 13 RS, SC 16 4 16  0 6 × 8 in 9 NR 15/16 (93.8) 14/15 (93.3) 138.7 ± 124.6 1/15 (6.7 %): fatal severe acute arterial bleeding (1)
8 × 8 in 4
10 × 10 in 3
Tsuchiya (2018) 14 PS, MC 19 19  0 6 × 8 in 10 17.3 ± 5.5 19/19 (100) 18/19 (94.7) 184 (range 12–819)
(median)
7/19 (36.8 %): fever (1); cholangitis (2, in 1 after stent obstruction); stent dysfunction/obstruction (3); stent dislodgement (1)
8 × 8 in 9
Puga (2019) 15 PS, SC  7  7  0 6 × 8 in 6 NR 7/7 (100) 5/8 5 (62.5) 66 6 (95 % CI, 7–127) 2/7 (28.6 %): fatal bleeding (2)
8 × 8 in 1
Jacques (2019) 16 RS, MC 52 7 52  0 6 × 8 in 43 17.2 (range 9–25) (median) 46/52$ (88.5) 46/46 (100 %) 155 7/46 (15.2 %): cholangitis caused by obstruction or dysfunction of the stent in all
8 × 8 in 7
15 × 10 in 2
Anderloni (2019) 17 RS, SC 46 4 46  0 6 × 8 in 21 17.3 ± 3.3 43/46 (93.5) 42/43 (97.7) 114.4 (95 % CI, 73.2–155.4) 5/43 (11.6 %): fatal bleeding (1); stent occlusion (3); stent migration (1)
8 × 8 in 19
10 × 10 in 6
El Chafic (2019) 18 RS, MC 67 67  0 10 × 10 in all 17.6 ± 3.6 64/67 (95.5) 40/40 8 (100 %) 119 (median) 11/64 (17.2 %) 9 : abdominal pain (2); peritonitis (1); bleeding (1); stent dysfunction/obstruction (7)
Fabbri (2019) 19 CS, SC  5 10  5  0 8 × 8 in 4 20.2 ± 5.7 5/5 (100) 5/5 (100) 34.6 ± 8.1 None related to the procedure
10 × 10 in 1
Jacques (2020) 20 RS, MC 70 70  0 6 × 8 in 60 17.7 ± 5.0 69/70 (97.1) 69/69 (100 %) 153 (median) 8/69 (11.6 %): bleeding due to fistulotomy (1); stent migration (1); cholangitis (2, in 1 after stent occlusion); tumoral stent obstruction (4)
8 × 8 in 9
15 × 10 in 1

CBD, common bile duct; AEs, adverse events; RS, retrospective study; SC, single center; MC, multicenter; CS, case series; PS, prospective study; NR, not reported; EUS-CDS, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy; LA-SEMS, lumen-apposing self-e × pandable metal stents.

 1

In one of the patients, the distal flange release failed technically, but the stent system was successfully e × changed for a second system over the guidewire.

 2

Patients in this case series presented simultaneous duodenal and biliary malignant obstruction and were treated by single-session sequential EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy and duodenal stenting.

 3

The technical failure was due to duodenal perforation occurring while performing dilation of the fistulous tract;

 4

It is possible that some of the patients were reported in both studies.

 5

Patients were reported as a cohort of eight including one patient in whom EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a plastic stent was performed, and clinical success was not presented separately for the LA-SEMS stents.

 6

All patients died during follow-up.

 7

One of the patients presented with benign biliary obstruction (CBD stones).

 8

Only 40 patients who were followed-up for more than 4 weeks were considered for this end point.

 9

Biliary reinterventions for obstruction were needed in 7 (17.5 %), in 3 of 6 patients who underwent EUS-CDS with LA-SEMS alone versus 4 of 34 with LA-SEMS plus an a × is-orienting device.

10

In this case series, choledochoduodenostomy was performed as a bridge to surgery since all patients presented with malignancy causing biliary obstruction in a resectable stage.