Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;231(9):547–555. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3608-5

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a) Matrix with insufficient occluso-cervical curvature not contacting adjacent tooth following appropriate wedging. b, c) Matrix with increased occluso-cervical curvature resulting in acceptable positioning of contact (potentially slightly coronal). However, adaptation occlusal to the contact area is sub-optimal, potentially requiring increased finishing. Repositioning the matrix more apically may address these issues. This may require adjustment of the matrix cervically. d, e) Matrix with increased occluso-cervical curvature resulting in good positioning of contact and improved adaptation occlusal to the contact. This is the most appropriate matrix selection from these three matrices in this specific situation. Note however that the increased curvature may lead to increased potential for placement distortion