Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;31(12):9436–9445. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08062-x

Table 2.

Comparison of n = 20 knee examinations with all three modalities: CT, 3-T MRI, and 7-T MRI in regard to (a) cartilage calcification (no/yes), (b) diagnostic confidence level (1 = “not confident,” 2 = “moderately confident,” 3 = “quite confident,” 4 = “highly confident”), and (c) sharpness of calcifications (1 = “very fuzzy,” 2 = “fairly fuzzy,” 3 = “fairly sharp,” 4 = “very sharp”). Cochrane Q test (°) was applied for the item “cartilage calcification,” otherwise Friedman test (+) was used. p values < .05 are considered to represent statistical significance

Comparison of cartilage calcification between CT, 3-T MRI, and 7-T MRI
Parameter

CT

N = 20

3 T

N = 20

7 T

N = 20

p value

°Cochrane Q test

+Friedman test

Multiple comparison analysis

Calcification (no/yes)

n

(%)

Reader 1

14/146

(9%/91%)

20/140

(13%/87%)*

13/147

(8%/92%)

0.008° Different from CT and 7 T*
Reader 2

14/146

(9%/91%)

24/136

(15%/85%)*

13/147

(8%/92%)

< 0.001° Different from CT and 7 T*

Diagnostic confidence, median (range)

1 = not confident

4 = highly confident

Reader 1 4 (1–4) 4 (1–4)* 4 (1–4) < 0.001+ Different from 7 T*
Reader 2 4 (1–4) 4 (1–4)* 4 (1–4) < 0.001+ Different from CT and 7 T*

Sharpness of calcification,

median (range)

1 = very fuzzy

4 = very sharp

Reader 1 2 (1–4) 2 (1–4) 3 (1–4)* < 0.001+ Different from CT and 3 T*
Reader 2 2 (1–4) 2 (1–4) 4 (1–4)* < 0.001+ Different from CT and 3 T*

*Statistically significant difference in the respective score, column “multiple comparison analysis” specifies between which two modalities the differences occur