Table 1.
An overview of the responses to the closed-ended items of the feedback questionnaire
| Strongly | Question | n | disagree | Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Agree | Strongly agree | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptability | I enjoyed this training method | 16 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (19%) | 13 (81%) | 4.8 (0.40) |
| Acceptability | The application was easy to use | 16 | 0 (0%) | 3 (19%) | 8 (50%) | 4 (25%) | 1 (6%) | 3.2 (0.83) |
| Acceptability | I will train and study differently when I know I will be assessed with the HoloLens | 16 | 1 (6%) | 2 (13%) | 4 (25%) | 6 (8%) | 3 (19%) | 3.5 (1.15) |
| Acceptability | I feel more confident about my skills after a HoloLens training | 16 | 0 (0%) | 2 (13%) | 2 (13%) | 7 (44%) | 5 (31%) | 3.9 (1.00) |
| Acceptability | The HoloLens hindered me to perform the Biopsy procedure | 16 | 5 (31%) | 4 (25%) | 5 (31%) | 2 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 2.3 (1.06) |
| Acceptability | This HoloLens app is a good addition to my current training | 16 | 0 (0%) | 2 (13%) | 1 (6%) | 2 (13%) | 11 (69%) | 4.4 (1.09) |
| Accuracy | The simulation of the procedure was realistic | 16 | 1 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (25%) | 9 (56%) | 2 (13%) | 3.7 (0.95) |
| Accuracy | The accuracy of the needle placement was adequate | 16 | 0 (0%) | 4 (25%) | 1 (6%) | 8 (50%) | 3 (19%) | 3.6 (1.09) |
| Accuracy | The haptic feedback from the gelatin phantom was realistic | 16 | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | 4 (25%) | 11 (69%) | 0 (0%) | 3.6 (0.62) |
| Feasibility | I could demonstrate my skills effectively | 16 | 0 (0%) | 4 (25%) | 6 (38%) | 5 -(31%) | 1 -(6%) | 3.2 (0.91) |
| Feasibility | I experienced discomfort wearing the HoloLens | 16 | 11 (69%) | 3 (19%) | 2-(13%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1.4 (0.73) |