Table 3.
Sensitivity of the three radiologists alone and combined with deep learning-generated detections and their individual reading times
| Sensitivity, in % (detected/overall) | Reading time | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without DLM | With DLM | Difference | (s; mean ± SD) | |
| Reader 1 | 91.3 (115/126) | 97.6 (123/126) | 6.3 (8/126) | 40.5 ± 12.8 |
| Reader 2 | 86.5 (109/126) | 97.6 (123/126) | 11.1 (14/126) | 45.8 ± 17.7 |
| Reader 3 | 86.5 (109/126) | 96.0 (121/126) | 9.5 (12/126) | 42.7 ± 10.6 |
| Mean | 88.1 | 97.1 | 9.0 | |
| 95% CI | 81.2–95.0 | 94.8–99.4 | 2.9–15.0 | |
| P-value | 0.024 (vs. without DLM)* | 0.017 | ||
Reader 1: 13 years, reader 2: 4 years, and reader 3: 3 years of experience in diagnostic neuroradiology. DLM, deep learning model; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation
*Determined by paired Student’s t-test