Table 2.
Diagnostic performance of qualitative assessment of vertebral compression fractures (VCF) for each reader
| AUC [95% CI] | Sensitivity (%) [95% CI] | Specificity (%) [95% CI] | +LR | −LR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reader 1 | 0.99 [0.95, 1.00] | 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) | 98.4 [91.5, 100.0] (62/63) | 63.0 [9.0, 440.0] | 0 |
| Reader 2 | 0.99 [0.95, 1.00] | 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) | 98.4 [91.5, 100.0] (62/63) | 63.0 [9.0, 440.0] | 0 |
| Reader 3 | 0.97 [0.91, 0.99] | 93.8 [79.2, 99.2] (30/32) | 100.0 [94.3, 100.0] (63/63) | NA | 0.06 [0.0, 0.2] |
| Reader 4 | 0.98 [0.92, 1.00] | 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) | 95.2 [86.7, 99.0] (60/63) | 21.0 [7.0, 63.4] | 0 |
Two-by-two differences: no statistical difference between readers (all p > 0.29, Bonferroni corrected significance level p < 0.008)
AUC, area under the curve; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; −LR, negative likelihood ratio; NA, not applicable. Raw data are reported in parentheses wherever applicable