Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;31(12):9418–9427. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07947-1

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of qualitative assessment of vertebral compression fractures (VCF) for each reader

AUC [95% CI] Sensitivity (%) [95% CI] Specificity (%) [95% CI] +LR −LR
Reader 1 0.99 [0.95, 1.00] 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) 98.4 [91.5, 100.0] (62/63) 63.0 [9.0, 440.0] 0
Reader 2 0.99 [0.95, 1.00] 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) 98.4 [91.5, 100.0] (62/63) 63.0 [9.0, 440.0] 0
Reader 3 0.97 [0.91, 0.99] 93.8 [79.2, 99.2] (30/32) 100.0 [94.3, 100.0] (63/63) NA 0.06 [0.0, 0.2]
Reader 4 0.98 [0.92, 1.00] 100.0 [89.1, 100.0] (32/32) 95.2 [86.7, 99.0] (60/63) 21.0 [7.0, 63.4] 0

Two-by-two differences: no statistical difference between readers (all p > 0.29, Bonferroni corrected significance level p < 0.008)

AUC, area under the curve; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; −LR, negative likelihood ratio; NA, not applicable. Raw data are reported in parentheses wherever applicable