Table 2.
Studies of digital inhalers reporting clinical outcomes
Author (year) Design Setting |
Study population Study group(s) Duration |
Digital device Drug(s) |
Patient and clinician interfaces with EMD and apps | Primary endpoint(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alshabani (2018) [47] (Abstract only) Prospective open-label |
COPD patients at high risk of adverse events from COPD (n = 20) 6 months | Propeller (albuterol pMDI) |
EMD with clinician dashboard Poor compliance by excess SABA or daily controller use prompted clinician response |
All-cause HCU with EMD + dashboard compared to prior year |
Alshabani (2020) [48] Retrospective pre- and post- analysis, open-label |
COPD patients with high health care utilization (n = 39) 12 months |
Propeller (digital inhalers for both controller and albuterol pMDI) |
EMD with patient dashboard Patients alerted when adherence to controller was suboptimal or rescue inhaler use increased |
All-cause and COPD HCU compared with year prior to enrolment in study |
Barrett (2017) [40] Prospective, observational Community project |
People with asthma > 4 years old (n = 95) 13 months |
Propeller Albuterol pMDI |
Smartphone app to aid patient self-management No clinician dashboard |
SABA use compared to 30 day baseline ACT and c-ACT compared to 30 day baseline |
Chan (2015) [35] RCT Children with asthma presenting to ED |
Children with asthma aged 6–15 years on ICS with recent exacerbation requiring ED (n = 220) EMD + BF vs. usual care 6 months |
Adherium SmartTrack® ICS pMDI Albuterol pMDI |
Patient adherence reminders by device |
School absenteeism (co-primary) Medication adherence (co-primary) |
Foster (2014) [37] RCT 6 months |
Adults with mod/severe asthma based on ACT (n = 143) EMD + BF + clinician/patient adherence discussions vs. EMD + BF vs. Clinician/patient adherence discussion only vs. Usual care 6 months |
Adherium SmartTrack® ICS/LABA (Accuhaler®) Albuterol pMDI |
Patient inhaler reminders with clinician dashboard prompting patient contact with suboptimal inhaler adherence |
ACT Mini-AQLQ Anxiety/depression scale |
Gregoriano (2019) [49] Single-blind RCT Pulmonary clinic |
Adult asthma and COPD with exacerbation in last year (n = 149) 6 months |
Adherium Hailie® sensor (formerly SmartInhaler) Albuterol pMDI Controllers DPI |
EMD with clinician dashboard + BF (patient inhaler alerts, clinician assessments) vs. Passive EMD |
Time to first exacerbation |
Kaye(2020) [42] (Abstract only) Prospective, observational |
COPD (n = 1000) 6 months |
Propeller Albuterol pMDI |
EMD with patient dashboard |
CAT at 6 months compared to baseline Albuterol use |
Lin (2020) [50] Open-label study Inner city school |
Asthma 10–17 years old (n = 21) Inner city school-based intervention 6 months |
Propeller Health Albuterol pMDI and controllers |
Monthly clinic visits Clinician and patient dashboards Behavioral interventions to improve adherence |
Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI) |
Merchant (2016) [38] RCT, parallel arms Allergy clinic |
Children and adults with asthma > 5 years old (n = 495) EMD + BF vs. Usual care 12 months |
Propeller Albuterol pMDI |
Clinician access to dashboard Personalized feedback to patient via mobile phone app |
SABA-free days |
Merchant (2018) [51] Prospective, open-label Allergy clinic |
Adults with asthma (n = 224) (n = 76 on controller medication) 12 months |
Propeller Albuterol pMDI Various controllers |
Clinician access to web-based dashboard Patient feedback from software on personal device |
ED visits Hospitalizations Combined ED visits and hospitalizations |
Moore (2020) [43] (Abstract only) Open-label, parallel-group RCT |
Adults with uncontrolled asthma (ACT < 20) on fixed-dose ICS/LABA maintenance therapy (n = 437) 6 months |
Ellipta sensor Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol Ellipta DPI Albuterol pMDI |
One of five connected inhaler systems with different levels of data feedback from sensors: (1) Maintenance use to participants and health care professionals (HCPs) (N = 87); (2) Maintenance use to participants (N = 88); (3) Maintenance and rescue use to participants and HCPs (N = 88); (4) Maintenance and rescue use to participants (N = 88); (5) No feedback (control) (N = 86) |
Mean adherence to maintenance treatment at 4–6 months |
Morton (2017) [46] Open-label RCT |
Pediatric asthma 6–16 years old (n = 77) Intervention group (EMD with controller reminders and review of adherence at clinic visits) 1 year |
Adherium Hailie® sensors for pMDI and for turbuhaler (formerly Smartinhaler®, SmartTurbo®) ICS pMDI and ICS DPI SABA pMDI |
Passive recording of EMD use Adherence reviewed at clinic visits with health care provider |
Asthma Control Questionnaire |
Mosnaim (2020) [36] RCT, single blinded Allergy clinic |
Adults with uncontrolled asthma (n = 100) EMD + BF vs. Usual care with passive EMD 14 weeks |
Propeller ICS and SABA pMDI |
Yes | SABA-free days |
O’Dwyer Randomized parallel study Community pharmacies and clinics |
Adult asthma(n = 83) COPD (n = 55) Intervention group EMD + BF vs. Intervention group inhaler training only vs. Control group—usual care 6 months |
INCA (Seretide® Accuhaler) | EMD + BF | ICS/LABA adherence (frequency of use and proper inhaler technique) |
Sulaiman (2018)[41] RCT Pulmonary clinic |
Adults with severe asthma with exacerbation in last year (n = 360) Control (Intensive education) vs. Intervention (Intensive education + BF from EMD) 3 months |
INCA (Seretide®) |
ICS/LABA adherence (frequency of user and inhaler technique) |
Author (year) Design Setting |
Secondary endpoint(s) | Primary outcome | Secondary outcome | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alshabani (2018) [47] (Abstract only) Prospective open-label |
All-cause HCU (hosp + ED) lower with EMD + BF (p = 0.034) COPD-related hospitalization was also lower with EMD + BF (2.3 (2.2) vs. 3.9 (3.2) but not significant (p = 0.07), no CI provided |
Prompted patient contact by clinicians | ||
Alshabani (2020) [48] Retrospective pre- and post- analysis, open-label |
Reduction in COPD-related HCU per year (2.2 [±2.3] vs. 3.4 [±3.2], p = 0.01). Reduction in all-cause HCU, but this was not statistically significant (3.4 [±2.6] vs. 4.7 [±4.1], p = 0.06), no CI provided | Average adherence was 44.4% (28.4%), with mean Charlson comorbidity index 5.6 (2.7) | ||
Barrett (2017) [40] Prospective, observational Community project |
–– |
39% ↓in SABA use in first 30 days (p < 0.001) Higher proportion with controlled asthma |
Increase in percentage of symptom-free days from 77% during the baseline period to 86% after the first month (12% improvement) | |
Chan (2015) [35] RCT Children with asthma presenting to ED |
Asthma morbidity score Child ACT FEV1 Exacerbations |
Median medication adherence: 84% (10th percentile 54%, 90th percentile 96%) with EMD vs. 30% (8%, 68%) in control group (p < 0.0001) No difference in school absenteeism |
Improved asthma score from baseline with EMD Improvement in asthma morbidity score (p = 0.008) and Childhood ACT (p < 0.0001) improved in EMD + BF Lower SABA use in EMD + BF (median % of days of SABA use = 9.5% [10th percentile 1.1%, 90th percentile 32.8%] in the intervention group vs. 17.4% [2.4%, 49.2%] in the control group; p = 0.002) No effect on FEV1 |
Adherence reduced over 6 months in both groups though difference between two groups remained statistically significant |
Foster (2014) [37] RCT 6 months |
ICS/LABA adherence FEV1 |
No difference in ACT among 4 groups (p = 0.14) |
Adherence in EMD + BF + adherence discussion = 76% (95% CI: 65–86%), EMD + BF = 71% (95% CI: 61–81%); usual care = 46% (95% CI: 36–55%); discussion only group = 46% (95% CI: 32–60%) ↓ exacerbation rates with inhaler reminders (11% vs. 28%; p = 0.13) No difference in other PRO or FEV1 among 3 groups |
|
Gregoriano (2019) [49] Single-blind RCT Pulmonary clinic |
Exacerbation frequency Controller adherence SGRQ score |
No effect on time to first exacerbation (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.21–2.07, p = 0.024) |
Nonsignificant decrease in exacerbation frequency (RR = 0.61, CI: = 0.35–1.03, p = 0.07) Days adherent greater in intervention group (pMDI 82 ± 14% vs. 60 ± 30%, p = 0.01) and DPI controllers (90 ± 10% vs. 80 ± 21%, p = 0.01) No effects on SGRQ |
Exacerbations defined by acute worsening requiring contacting the clinician (not based on oral steroid use) |
Kaye(2020) [42] (Abstract only) Prospective, observational |
Albuterol use declined by 0.8 puffs/day (95% CI: −0.9 to −0.7; p < 0.001) compared to baseline CAT score decreased by 1.1 points (95% CI: −1.4 to −0.8; p < 0.001) |
Albuterol use greater in non-adherent patients 46% of subjects met MCID for CAT (> 2 change) |
||
Lin (2020) [50] Open-label study Inner city school |
School absenteeism Exacerbations Medication adherence |
No change in mean CASI from baseline; no CI provided |
Decrease in school absenteeism (p = 0.003) Exacerbations decreased (p < 0001) Controller adherence increased by 8% during active intervention (months 1–5, p = 0.03), but returned to baseline by month 6 without behavioral interventions |
81% with step-up in controller therapies |
Merchant (2016) [38] RCT, parallel arms Allergy clinic |
ACT |
↑SABA-free days in EMD + BF vs. usual care group +17% vs. +21%, p < 0.01); no CI provided |
↑ in ACT with EMD + BF vs. control group (+6.2 vs. +4.6 p < 0.01) | Attrition 14.8% at 1 month and > 55% at 12 months |
Merchant (2018) [51] Prospective, open-label Allergy clinic |
SABA use ICS adherence |
ED visits lower compared to baseline period (rate difference 6.3 [95% CI: 0.9–11.6], p = 0.04) Combined ED visits and hospitalizations lower (rate difference 7.6 [95% CI: 1.9–13.3]; p = 0.02) |
SABA use ↓by 0.52 puffs/daily (95% CI: −0.69 to −0.34; p < 0.05) ↑ controller use 0.82 vs. 0.66 (0.16 [95% CI: 0.07–0.25]; p < 0.01) |
↑Outpatient visits by 2.6 (95% CI: 2.2, 2.9) visits per patient-year (p < 0.01) |
Moore (2020) [43] (Abstract only) Open-label, parallel-group RCT |
SABA-free days ACT score |
Mean (SD) adherence 82.2 (16.58)% in the “maintenance to participants and HCPs” arm and 70.8 (27.30)% in the control arm; difference of 12.0% (95% CI: 5.2–18.8%; p < 0.001) Adherence also significantly greater in other arms vs. control |
Mean % SABA-free days (months 4–6) significantly greater in those who received data on rescue use vs. control ACT scores improved in all study arms—no significant differences between groups |
Only measured inhaler use months 4–6 |
Morton (2017) [46] Open-label RCT |
Adherence to ICS and use of SABA Acute care visits to office or ED FEV1 Pediatric Asthma QOL Questionnaire (PAQLQ) Guideline-based severity |
No difference in Asthma Control Questionnaire (difference of the paired mean difference from baseline to 12 months = −0.18 (95% CI: −0.76 to 0.38; p = 0.51) |
Adherence improved in intervention group 70% vs. 49% (p = 0.001); no CI provided Fewer exacerbations in intervention group (controls 53% more likely to receive steroids—incident risk ratio = 1.53 [95% CI: 1.11–2.11]; p = 0.008) and hospitalizations (p < 0.001) No significant difference in SABA use, FEV1, or PAQLQ or asthma severity |
Substantial number of devices damaged or lost by the children |
Mosnaim (2020) [36] RCT, single blinded Allergy clinic |
ICS adherence |
↑ in SABA-free days = 19% (95% CI: 12–26%; p < 0.01) for EMD + BF vs. 6% (95% CI: −3 to 16; p = 0.18) in control group (passive EMD) |
ICS adherence over 14 weeks = −2% (95% CI: −7 to 3%; p = 0.40) in EMD + BF vs. −17% (95% CI: −26 to −8%; p < 0.01) in control group |
Exploratory outcomes of exacerbations and asthma control not different |
O’Dwyer Randomized parallel study Community pharmacies and clinics |
SGRQ Resp symptoms |
↑Adherence 60.8% in EMD + BF + inhaler instruction vs. 44.2% in inhaler instruction only vs. 33.2% in usual care group (14% higher [95% CI: −1 to 30]; p = 0.07) in the BF group vs. demonstration group and 31% higher (95% CI: 13–48; p = 0.001) than in the control group) |
SGRQ (−6.1; 95% CI: −9 to −0.4; p = 0.04) in EMD + BF group at 2 and 6 months Inhaler training group had improvement at 2 months, but not at 6 months |
Pharmacies were unit of randomization Community pharmacists were trained and provided interventions |
Sulaiman (2018)[41] RCT Pulmonary clinic |
ACT AQLQ PEF |
73% adherence (frequency of use, correct technique) in EMD + BF vs. 63% in control group (difference = 10%; 95% CI: 2.8–17.6%; p = 0.02) |
PEF at 3 months, no statistically significant difference between groups ACT or AQLQ, no statistically significantly different between groups |
27% of participants with severe asthma were refractory to current treatment despite being adherent and receiving intensive education |
ACT Asthma Control Test, AQLQ Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, BF = biofeedback, CAT COPD Assessment Test, CI confidence interval, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, DPI dry powder inhaler, ED emergency department, EMD electronic monitoring device, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 second, HCU health care utilization, ICS inhaled corticosteroids, LABA long-acting beta agonist, MCID minimal clinically important difference, PAQLQ Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, PEF peak expiratory flow, pMDI pressurized metered-dose inhaler, PRO patient-reported outcomes, RCT randomized controlled trial, SD standard deviation, SABA short-acting beta agonist, SGRQ St George's Respiratory Questionnaire