Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 11;7(2):345–376. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00167-4

Table 2.

Studies of digital inhalers reporting clinical outcomes

Author (year)
Design
Setting
Study population
Study group(s)
Duration
Digital device
Drug(s)
Patient and clinician interfaces with EMD and apps Primary endpoint(s)

Alshabani (2018) [47]

(Abstract only)

Prospective open-label

COPD patients at high risk of adverse events from COPD (n = 20) 6 months Propeller (albuterol pMDI)

EMD with clinician dashboard

Poor compliance by excess SABA or daily controller use prompted clinician response

All-cause HCU with EMD + dashboard compared to prior year

Alshabani (2020) [48]

Retrospective pre- and post- analysis, open-label

COPD patients with high health care utilization (n = 39)

12 months

Propeller (digital inhalers for both controller and albuterol pMDI)

EMD with patient dashboard

Patients alerted when adherence to controller was suboptimal or rescue inhaler use increased

All-cause and COPD HCU compared with year prior to enrolment in study

Barrett (2017) [40]

Prospective, observational

Community project

People with asthma > 4 years old (n = 95) 13 months

Propeller

Albuterol pMDI

Smartphone app to aid patient self-management

No clinician dashboard

SABA use compared to 30 day baseline

ACT and c-ACT compared to 30 day baseline

Chan (2015) [35]

RCT

Children with asthma presenting to ED

Children with asthma aged 6–15 years on ICS with recent exacerbation requiring ED (n = 220)

EMD + BF

vs. usual care 6 months

Adherium

SmartTrack®

ICS pMDI

Albuterol pMDI

Patient adherence reminders by device

School absenteeism (co-primary)

Medication adherence (co-primary)

Foster (2014) [37]

RCT

6 months

Adults with mod/severe asthma based on ACT (n = 143)

EMD + BF + clinician/patient adherence discussions vs.

EMD + BF

vs.

Clinician/patient adherence discussion only

vs.

Usual care

6 months

Adherium SmartTrack®

ICS/LABA (Accuhaler®)

Albuterol pMDI

Patient inhaler reminders with clinician dashboard prompting patient contact with suboptimal inhaler adherence

ACT

Mini-AQLQ

Anxiety/depression scale

Gregoriano (2019) [49]

Single-blind RCT

Pulmonary clinic

Adult asthma and COPD with exacerbation in last year (n = 149)

6 months

Adherium Hailie® sensor (formerly SmartInhaler)

Albuterol pMDI

Controllers DPI

EMD with clinician dashboard + BF (patient inhaler alerts, clinician assessments)

vs.

Passive EMD

Time to first exacerbation

Kaye(2020) [42]

(Abstract only)

Prospective, observational

COPD (n = 1000)

6 months

Propeller

Albuterol pMDI

EMD with patient dashboard

CAT at 6 months compared to baseline

Albuterol use

Lin (2020) [50]

Open-label study

Inner city school

Asthma 10–17 years old (n = 21)

Inner city school-based intervention

6 months

Propeller Health

Albuterol pMDI and controllers

Monthly clinic visits

Clinician and patient dashboards

Behavioral interventions to improve adherence

Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)

Merchant (2016) [38]

RCT, parallel arms

Allergy clinic

Children and adults with asthma > 5 years old (n = 495)

EMD + BF

vs.

Usual care

12 months

Propeller

Albuterol pMDI

Clinician access to dashboard

Personalized feedback to patient via mobile phone app

SABA-free days

Merchant

(2018) [51]

Prospective, open-label

Allergy clinic

Adults with asthma (n = 224) (n = 76 on controller medication)

12 months

Propeller

Albuterol pMDI

Various controllers

Clinician access to web-based dashboard

Patient feedback from software on personal device

ED visits

Hospitalizations

Combined ED visits and hospitalizations

Moore (2020) [43]

(Abstract only)

Open-label, parallel-group RCT

Adults with uncontrolled asthma (ACT < 20) on fixed-dose ICS/LABA maintenance therapy (n = 437)

6 months

Ellipta sensor

Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol Ellipta DPI

Albuterol pMDI

One of five connected inhaler systems with different levels of data feedback from sensors:

(1) Maintenance use to participants and health care professionals (HCPs) (N = 87); (2) Maintenance use to participants (N = 88); (3) Maintenance and rescue use to participants and HCPs (N = 88); (4) Maintenance and rescue use to participants (N = 88); (5) No feedback (control) (N = 86)

Mean adherence to maintenance treatment at 4–6 months

Morton (2017) [46]

Open-label RCT

Pediatric asthma 6–16 years old (n = 77)

Intervention group (EMD with controller reminders

and review of adherence at clinic visits)

1 year

Adherium Hailie® sensors for pMDI and for turbuhaler (formerly Smartinhaler®, SmartTurbo®)

ICS pMDI and ICS DPI

SABA pMDI

Passive recording of EMD use

Adherence reviewed at clinic visits with health care provider

Asthma Control Questionnaire

Mosnaim (2020) [36]

RCT, single blinded

Allergy clinic

Adults with uncontrolled asthma (n = 100)

EMD + BF

vs.

Usual care with passive EMD

14 weeks

Propeller

ICS and SABA pMDI

Yes SABA-free days

O’Dwyer

(2020) [39, 52]

Randomized parallel study

Community pharmacies and clinics

Adult asthma(n = 83)

COPD (n = 55)

Intervention group EMD + BF

vs.

Intervention group inhaler training only

vs.

Control group—usual care

6 months

INCA (Seretide® Accuhaler) EMD + BF ICS/LABA adherence (frequency of use and proper inhaler technique)

Sulaiman

(2018)[41]

RCT

Pulmonary clinic

Adults with severe asthma with exacerbation in last year (n = 360)

Control (Intensive education)

vs.

Intervention

(Intensive education + BF from EMD)

3 months

INCA

(Seretide®)

ICS/LABA adherence (frequency of user and inhaler technique)
Author (year)
Design
Setting
Secondary endpoint(s) Primary outcome Secondary outcome Comments

Alshabani (2018) [47]

(Abstract only)

Prospective open-label

All-cause HCU (hosp + ED) lower with EMD + BF (p = 0.034)

COPD-related hospitalization was also lower with EMD + BF (2.3 (2.2) vs. 3.9 (3.2) but not significant (p = 0.07), no CI provided

Prompted patient contact by clinicians

Alshabani (2020) [48]

Retrospective pre- and post- analysis, open-label

Reduction in COPD-related HCU per year (2.2 [±2.3] vs. 3.4 [±3.2], p = 0.01). Reduction in all-cause HCU, but this was not statistically significant (3.4 [±2.6] vs. 4.7 [±4.1], p = 0.06), no CI provided Average adherence was 44.4% (28.4%), with mean Charlson comorbidity index 5.6 (2.7)

Barrett (2017) [40]

Prospective, observational

Community project

––

39% ↓in SABA use in first 30 days (p < 0.001)

Higher proportion with controlled asthma

Increase in percentage of symptom-free days from 77% during the baseline period to 86% after the first month (12% improvement)

Chan (2015) [35]

RCT

Children with asthma presenting to ED

Asthma morbidity score

Child ACT

FEV1

Exacerbations

Median medication adherence: 84% (10th percentile 54%, 90th percentile 96%) with EMD vs. 30% (8%, 68%) in control group (p < 0.0001)

No difference in school absenteeism

Improved asthma score from baseline with EMD

Improvement in asthma morbidity score (p = 0.008) and Childhood ACT (p < 0.0001) improved in EMD + BF

Lower SABA use in EMD + BF (median % of days of SABA use = 9.5% [10th percentile 1.1%, 90th

percentile 32.8%] in the intervention group vs. 17.4%

[2.4%, 49.2%] in the control group; p = 0.002)

No effect on FEV1

Adherence reduced over 6 months in both groups though difference between two groups remained statistically significant

Foster (2014) [37]

RCT

6 months

ICS/LABA adherence

FEV1

No difference in ACT among 4 groups (p = 0.14)

Adherence in EMD + BF + adherence discussion = 76% (95% CI: 65–86%), EMD + BF = 71% (95% CI: 61–81%); usual care = 46% (95% CI: 36–55%); discussion only group = 46% (95% CI: 32–60%)

↓ exacerbation rates with inhaler reminders (11% vs. 28%; p = 0.13)

No difference in other PRO or FEV1 among 3 groups

Gregoriano (2019) [49]

Single-blind RCT

Pulmonary clinic

Exacerbation frequency

Controller adherence

SGRQ score

No effect on time to first exacerbation (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.21–2.07, p = 0.024)

Nonsignificant decrease in exacerbation frequency (RR = 0.61, CI: = 0.35–1.03, p = 0.07)

Days adherent greater in intervention group (pMDI 82 ± 14% vs. 60 ± 30%, p  = 0.01) and

DPI controllers (90 ± 10% vs. 80 ± 21%, p = 0.01)

No effects on SGRQ

Exacerbations defined by acute worsening requiring contacting the clinician (not based on oral steroid use)

Kaye(2020) [42]

(Abstract only)

Prospective, observational

Albuterol use declined by 0.8 puffs/day (95% CI: −0.9 to −0.7; p < 0.001) compared to baseline

CAT score decreased by 1.1 points (95% CI: −1.4 to −0.8; p < 0.001)

Albuterol use greater in non-adherent patients

46% of subjects met MCID for CAT (> 2 change)

Lin (2020) [50]

Open-label study

Inner city school

School absenteeism

Exacerbations

Medication adherence

No change in mean CASI from baseline; no CI provided

Decrease in school absenteeism (p = 0.003)

Exacerbations decreased (p < 0001)

Controller adherence increased by 8% during active intervention (months 1–5, p = 0.03), but returned to baseline by month 6 without behavioral interventions

81% with step-up in controller therapies

Merchant (2016) [38]

RCT, parallel arms

Allergy clinic

ACT

↑SABA-free days in EMD + BF vs. usual care group

+17% vs. +21%, p < 0.01); no CI provided

↑ in ACT with EMD + BF vs. control group (+6.2 vs. +4.6 p < 0.01) Attrition 14.8% at 1 month and > 55% at 12 months

Merchant

(2018) [51]

Prospective, open-label

Allergy clinic

SABA use

ICS adherence

ED visits lower compared to baseline period (rate difference 6.3 [95% CI: 0.9–11.6], p = 0.04)

Combined ED visits and hospitalizations lower (rate difference 7.6 [95% CI: 1.9–13.3]; p = 0.02)

SABA use ↓by 0.52 puffs/daily (95% CI: −0.69 to −0.34; p < 0.05)

↑ controller use 0.82 vs. 0.66 (0.16 [95% CI: 0.07–0.25]; p < 0.01)

↑Outpatient visits by 2.6 (95% CI: 2.2, 2.9) visits per patient-year (p < 0.01)

Moore (2020) [43]

(Abstract only)

Open-label, parallel-group RCT

SABA-free days

ACT score

Mean (SD) adherence 82.2 (16.58)% in the “maintenance to participants and HCPs” arm and 70.8 (27.30)% in the control arm; difference of 12.0% (95% CI: 5.2–18.8%; p < 0.001)

Adherence also significantly greater in other arms vs. control

Mean % SABA-free days (months 4–6) significantly greater in those who received data on rescue use vs. control

ACT scores improved in all study arms—no significant differences between groups

Only measured inhaler use months 4–6

Morton (2017) [46]

Open-label RCT

Adherence to ICS and use of SABA

Acute care visits to office or ED

FEV1

Pediatric Asthma QOL Questionnaire (PAQLQ)

Guideline-based severity

No difference in Asthma Control Questionnaire (difference of the paired mean difference from baseline to 12 months =  −0.18 (95% CI: −0.76 to 0.38; p = 0.51)

Adherence improved in intervention group 70% vs. 49% (p = 0.001); no CI provided

Fewer exacerbations in intervention group (controls 53% more likely to receive steroids—incident risk ratio = 1.53 [95% CI: 1.11–2.11]; p = 0.008) and hospitalizations (p < 0.001)

No significant difference in SABA use, FEV1, or PAQLQ or asthma severity

Substantial number of devices damaged or lost by the children

Mosnaim (2020) [36]

RCT, single blinded

Allergy clinic

ICS adherence

↑ in SABA-free days = 19% (95% CI: 12–26%; p < 0.01) for EMD + BF

vs.

6% (95% CI: −3 to 16; p = 0.18) in control group (passive EMD)

ICS adherence over 14 weeks = −2% (95% CI: −7 to 3%; p = 0.40) in EMD + BF

vs.

−17% (95% CI: −26 to −8%; p < 0.01) in control group

Exploratory outcomes of exacerbations and asthma control not different

O’Dwyer

(2020) [39, 52]

Randomized parallel study

Community pharmacies and clinics

SGRQ

Resp symptoms

↑Adherence 60.8% in EMD + BF + inhaler instruction

vs.

44.2% in inhaler instruction only

vs.

33.2% in usual care group

(14% higher [95% CI: −1 to 30]; p = 0.07) in the BF group vs. demonstration group and 31% higher (95% CI: 13–48; p = 0.001) than in the control group)

SGRQ (−6.1; 95% CI: −9 to −0.4; p = 0.04) in EMD + BF group at 2 and 6 months

Inhaler training group had improvement at 2 months, but not at 6 months

Pharmacies were unit of randomization

Community pharmacists were trained and provided interventions

Sulaiman

(2018)[41]

RCT

Pulmonary clinic

ACT

AQLQ

PEF

73% adherence (frequency of use, correct technique) in EMD + BF

vs.

63% in control group (difference = 10%; 95% CI: 2.8–17.6%; p = 0.02)

PEF at 3 months, no statistically significant difference between groups

ACT or AQLQ, no statistically significantly different between groups

27% of participants with severe asthma were refractory to current treatment despite being adherent and receiving intensive education

ACT Asthma Control Test, AQLQ Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, BF = biofeedback, CAT COPD Assessment Test, CI confidence interval, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, DPI dry powder inhaler, ED emergency department, EMD electronic monitoring device, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 second, HCU health care utilization, ICS inhaled corticosteroids, LABA long-acting beta agonist, MCID minimal clinically important difference, PAQLQ  Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, PEF peak expiratory flow, pMDI pressurized metered-dose inhaler, PRO patient-reported outcomes, RCT randomized controlled trial, SD standard deviation, SABA short-acting beta agonist, SGRQ St George's Respiratory Questionnaire