Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;10(4):1057–1075. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00391-w

Table 3.

PICQ construct validity as assessed using known-groups defined by mesopic high-contrast UNVA

PICQ Score Time Groups N Mean SD Effect sizea p-valueb
Coping Day 1 Hour 0 20/125 or worse 20 3.21 0.52 0.19  < 0.001
20/80 and 20/100 78 2.69 0.67
20/63 or better 53 2.15 0.86
Day 21 Hour 1 20/125 or worse 2 3.18 0.02 0.15  < 0.001
20/80 and 20/100 30 2.69 0.79
20/63 or better 115 1.84 0.93
Impact Day 1 Hour 0 20/125 or worse 20 1.94 0.89 0.05 0.021
20/80 and 20/100 78 1.61 0.87
20/63 or better 53 1.30 0.99
Day 21 Hour 1 20/125 or worse 2 1.00 0.71 0.04 0.056
20/80 and 20/100 30 1.28 0.92
20/63 or better 115 0.89 0.76

ANOVA analysis of variance, PICQ Presbyopia Impact and Coping Questionnaire, UNVA uncorrected near visual acuity

aEffect size is eta-squared, computed as the between-groups sum of squares divided by the total sum of squares

bp-value is based on an F-test from an ANOVA comparing all levels of the group