Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg. 2021 May 13:S0002-9610(21)00280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.001

Table 4:

Distribution of tissue misclassification rate for participant surgeons versus PTeye® for excised specimens confirmed with histology. All participant surgeons visually confirmed PGs solely based on their surgical experience and remained blinded to output from PTeye®. Specimens such as diseased entire thyroid lobe/thyroid gland where the tissue identity was obvious to surgeons were not included for analysis.

Site Surgeon Surgeon experience at time of study Number of specimens confirmed with histology* Total misclassification versus histology* Misclassification per histology* specimen
Surgeon PTeye® Surgeon PTeye®
Site 1 Surgeon A > 10 years 28 2 5 0.07 0.18
Surgeon B < 5 years 12 3 2 0.25 0.17
Site 2 Surgeon C > 10 years 19 3 1 0.16 0.05
Surgeon D < 5 years 2 0 1 0.00 0.50
Site 3 Surgeon E > 10 years 55 5 7 0.09 0.13
Surgeon F < 5 years 38 10 0 0.26 0.00
Overall All surgeons > 10 years 103 10 13 0.10 0.13
All surgeons < 5 years 52 13 3 0.25** 0.06**
Total 155 23 16 0.15 0.10
*

Histology = frozen section analysis + permanent histology

**

p-value (Chi-square test) < 0.05.