Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;4:1286. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02814-7

Table 2.

Performance of various radiomics-guided DL models.

Training
Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value C-index
Radiomics 4.1384 (1.9140–8.9479) 0.0006 0.7459
Yolo 3.1728 (1.4675–6.8596) 0.0061 0.7994
DenseNet 4.4383 (2.0468–9.6241) 0.0003 0.7410
VGG 4.2454 (1.9658–9.1683) 0.0005 0.7660
Test
Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value C-index
Radiomics 5.0566 (1.5379–16.6263) 0.0180 0.6837
Yolo 7.6277 (2.2870–25.4399) 0.0027 0.7593
DenseNet 5.3620 (1.7011–18.5774) 0.0116 0.7214
VGG 4.7060 (1.4333–15.4520) 0.0244 0.8009
Validation
Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value C-index
Radiomics
Yolo 6.5362 (2.1773–19.6213) 0.0022 0.7696
DenseNet 4.2277 (1.4800–12.0768) 0.0153 0.7112
VGG 3.5488 (1.2409–10.1494) 0.0362 0.6757