Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;4:157. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1

Table 4.

Outcomes measured across included studies.

Primary outcome Author Study design Procedures Patient number Length of intervention Main finding
Postoperative pain management Campbell et al., 2019 RCT Hip or knee replacement 159 42 days Stopped taking narcotics 10 days sooner (P < 0.001)
Postoperative pain management Hou et al., 2019 RCT Lumbar spinal surgery 168 90 days No difference in pain scores
Postoperative pain management Khanwalkar et al., 2018 Prospective Sinus surgery 288 14 days Similar analgesic requirements across all included procedures
Postoperative pain management Anthony et al., 2018 Prospective Hand surgery 47 7 days Pain trended down sequentially over the first week
Postoperative complications Scheper et al., 2019 Prospective Joint arthroplasty 69 30 days 80% patient-reported complications concorded with physician diagnosis.
Postoperative complications Pozza et al., 2018 Prospective Cosmetic surgery 57 7 days All three complications were detected earlier in the postoperative period
Postoperative complications Sosa et al., 2017 Prospective Head and neck cancer resection 23 7 days Patients with postoperative complications are more likely to use a platform (P < 0.001)
Postoperative complications Carrier et al., 2016 Prospective Major colorectal resections 111 7 days Alerts led to early, timely detection of postoperative complications
Postoperative complications Palombo et al., 2009 Prospective Carotid endarterectomy 36 2 days The intervention allowed safe early discharge in selected patients
Postoperative symptom monitoring Graetz et al., 2018 RCT Gynaecological cancer surgery 29 (pilot) 30 days Feasible and acceptable to the patient population. Reminders increased use of a mobile application.
Postoperative symptom monitoring Dabbs et al., 2016 RCT Lung transplant 201 12 months Self-monitoring increased with app use, with patients more likely to report critical indicators (OR 5.11; P < 0.001)
Postoperative recovery Gräfitsch et al., 2020 Prospective Abdominal wall hernia repair 16 30 days 60% of patients regained preoperative activity levels within 3 weeks
Postoperative recovery Panda et al., 2019 Prospective Cancer surgery 62 6 weeks Patients with postoperative complications showed lower activity and ability to achieve 60 min of exertional activity
Postoperative recovery Campbell et al., 2019 RCT Hip or knee replacement 159 42 days Patients in the intervention group exercised for longer (8.6 min per day; P < 0.001)
Postoperative recovery Hou et al., 2019 RCT Lumbar spinal surgery 168 90 days Disability improved in mHealth group
Postoperative recovery Carmichael et al., 2019 Prospective Inguinal hernia (most common), abdominal and thoracic procedures 175 30 days Recovery trajectories have the potential to predict postoperative complications up to 3 days before readmission
Postoperative recovery Thijs et al., 2019 Prospective CABG 22 14 days Higher physical activity has seen following minimally invasive procedures
Postoperative recovery Cole et al., 2019 Prospective Transsphenoidal surgery 7 Up to 13 days (average 8 days) Step count fell by 45% following surgery
Postoperative recovery van der Meij et al., 2018 RCT Laparoscopic abdominal procedures 344 6 months Five-day reduction in return to normal activities (21 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.007)
Postoperative recovery Ghomrawi et al., 2018 Prospective Range of elective paediatric surgical procedures 60 14 days Different activity curves demonstrated for patients undergoing in-patient and out-patient procedures
Postoperative recovery Agarwal et al., 2018 Prospective Robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy 46 Up to 15 days Greatest reduction in postoperative step count seen in obese and men aged >65 years old
Postoperative recovery Jaensson et al., 2017 RCT Predominantly orthopaedic and general cases 997 14 days Improved recovery in several symptom domains
Postoperative recovery Park et al., 2017 RCT Total knee replacement 40 90 days SMS messages achieved similar postoperative recovery compared to routine care
Postoperative recovery Chiang et al., 2017 Prospective Total knee replacement 18 6 weeks Postoperative range of motion improved if haemostatic agent used intra-operatively
Postoperative recovery Sun et al., 2017 Prospective Major gastrointestinal resection 20 14 days Median step count at day 7 correlated with the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)
Postoperative recovery Abraham et al., 2017 Prospective Breast reconstruction 4 28 days Variance in total sleep duration is a potential marker of recovery
Postoperative recovery Toogood et al., 2016 Prospective Total hip arthroplasty 33 30 days Activity increased in a step-wise fashion post-discharge. Age and operative approach were associated with postoperative activity
Postoperative recovery Debono et al., 2016 Prospective Lumbar discectomy 60 16 days Deviations in expected postoperative recovery were identified early, reducing emergency department admissions
Postoperative recovery Mobbs et al., 2016 Prospective Lumbar spine surgery 30 90 days Daily mean step count and distance had improved at follow-up
Postoperative recovery Dawes et al., 2015 Prospective Any colorectal procedure 20 14 days Patients felt more aware of the recovery process and connected with their surgical team
Surgical site infection Mousa et al., 2019 RCT Infra-inguinal procedures 30 30 days No difference in 30-day surgical site infection rates
Surgical site infection Gunter et al., 2018 Prospective Lower limb vascular surgery 40 14 days Surgical site infection correctly identified in 87% of cases
Surgical site infection Castillo et al., 2017 Prospective C-section 105 30 days One surgical site infection identified through intervention
Surgical site infection Semple et al., 2015 Prospective Breast reconstruction and ACL repair 65 30 days All wound complications were correctly identified
Surgical site infection Martinez-Ramos et al., 2009 Prospective Range of ambulatory procedures 96 14 days Two-thirds of patients had their wound concerns successfully resolved without need for hospital review
Surgical site infection Perez et al., 2006 Prospective Predominantly orthopaedic procedures 49 Not stated Images modified original treatment plans and avoided emergency department attendance for 88%
Follow-up requirements Mousa et al., 2019 RCT Infra-inguinal procedures 30 30 days No difference in 30-day readmission rates
Follow-up requirements Felbaum et al., 2018 Prospective Spinal surgery 56 30 days Mobile application reduced hospital visits
Follow-up requirements Armstrong et al., 2017 RCT Breast reconstruction 65 30 days Fewer in-person follow-up care visits in mHealth group (0.4; P < 0.001)
Follow-up requirements Higgins et al., 2017 Prospective ACL reconstruction 32 6 weeks Intervention reduced the need for routine follow-up
Follow-up requirements McElroy et al., 2016 Prospective Cardiac surgery 27 30 days Readmissions similar between intervention and control groups
Weight loss Mangieri et al., 2019 RCT Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 56 24 months Application aided longer-term weight loss at 12 months post-surgery
Weight loss Tenhagen et al., 2016 Prospective Gastric sleeve or bypass 14 1 year Excess weight loss >40% in all patients
Feasibility Jonker et al., 2021 Prospective Oncological procedures 47 90 days Older patients (≥65 years old) can successfully perform home monitoring using DHIs, with good usability and acceptability
Feasibility Argent et al., 2019 Prospective Total knee replacement 15 14 days Biofeedback system improved rehabilitation experience for patients
Feasibility Scott et al., 2017 Prospective Colorectal surgery 20 14 days Low use of mobile application associated with inappropriate emergency department presentation in 63% of cases
Feasibility Symer et al., 2017 Prospective Open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery 31 30 days Patients generated an average of 1.1 alerts, but 50% of patients struggled to upload photographs