Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;10(13):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.13.13

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Quantitative evaluation of different methods. (A) Noise intensity, (B) connectivity, and (C) contrast compared between original scans and scans processed by different methods. A significant difference between the original and reconstructed images was achieved by all metrics, evaluated by paired t-test with Holm–Bonferroni correction. DCARnet achieves superior performance in noise intensity and connectivity.