Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 Nov 11;9:e12492. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12492

Transcriptome analysis and functional identification of GmMYB46 in soybean seedlings under salt stress

Xun Liu 1,2, Xinxia Yang 3, Bin Zhang 1,
Editor: Mahmood-ur-Rahman Ansari
PMCID: PMC8590805  PMID: 34824922

Abstract

Salinity is one of the major abiotic stress that limits crop growth and productivity. We investigated the transcriptomes of salt-treated soybean seedlings versus a control using RNA-seq to better understand the molecular mechanisms of the soybean (Glycine max L.) response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed 1,235 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under salt stress. Several important pathways and key candidate genes were identified by KEGG enrichment. A total of 116 differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) were identified, and 17 TFs were found to belong to MYB families. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these TFs may be involved in salt stress adaptation. Further analysis revealed that GmMYB46 was up-regulated by salt and mannitol and was localized in the nucleus. The salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 was significantly enhanced compared to wild-type (WT). GmMYB46 activates the expression of salt stress response genes (P5CS1, SOD, POD, NCED3) in Arabidopsis under salt stress, indicating that the GmMYB46 protein mediates the salt stress response through complex regulatory mechanisms. This study provides information with which to better understand the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in soybeans and to genetically improve the crop.

Keywords: Soybean, Transcriptome analysis, Salt stress, Differentially expressed genes, GmMYB46

Introduction

Plant growth and development are often affected by unfavorable external stimuli such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures. Salt stress may lead to decreased crop yields and it reportedly affects approximately 6% of arable land and 20% of irrigated land (Chen et al., 2021a). Soil salinization affects plant growth differently at each developmental stage, typically through osmotic stress and ion toxicity. Osmotic stress is the primary stressor and immediately affects plant growth when the plant is exposed to high salinity. Ion toxicity occurs later when NaCl concentration has reached a threshold beyond which the ion homeostasis in plants is disrupted (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). High salinity stress inhibits plants’ nutrient uptake, thus inhibiting growth and development (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Salt stress stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and hydroxyl radicals. ROS have a strong oxidative capacity and can cause cell plasma membrane damage, metabolic dysfunction, and cell death by disrupting redox homeostasis (Liang et al., 2018).

Plants have evolved many complex molecular and physiological mechanisms to adapt to salinized environments, such as the plant hormone signaling pathway, salt overly sensitive (SOS) signaling pathway, Na+ efflux or sequestration in vacuoles, transcriptional regulation, improvement of antioxidant enzyme activity, and osmolyte (which include proline and soluble sugar) accumulation (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Protein kinases (PKs) and protein phosphatases (PPs) in plant signal transduction pathways participate in abiotic stress responses through protein dephosphorylation. The PP2C protein family is reportedly important to the salt stress response because they affect plants’ metabolic process, hormone levels, and growth factors (Wang et al., 2020a). In addition, the maintenance of intracellular sodium and potassium homeostasis is essential for the survival of plants under salt stress, and many ion channels, transporters, and antiporters play a role in this process. For example, HKT1 (high-affinity potassium transporter 1) was initially thought to be an Na+/K+ symporter in wheat, and that Na+ was excreted by transpiration to enhance plant salt tolerance (Schachtman & Schroeder, 1994). However, the Arabidopsis AtHKT1 protein selectively transports Na+, affecting its distribution in roots and shoots (Ren et al., 2005). The tonoplast-localized NHX-type Na+/H+ exchangers have been reported to sequestrate Na+ into vacuoles and participate in K+ homeostasis. For example, plasma membrane-localized NHX7/SOS1 flushes excess Na+ through the roots and restricts excessive accumulation, which regulates intracellular ion homeostasis and enhances plant salt tolerance. However, the Arabidopsis sos1 mutant showed more sensitivity to salt stress (Ji et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2002). Nieves-Cordones et al. (2010) found that the high-affinity potassium transporter 5 (HAK5) could promote K+ absorption under high salinity conditions, which was beneficial to maintaining the balance of Na+/K+. However, some HAK family members can regulate Na+ translocation. Wang et al. (2020b) revealed that SlHAK20 transported Na+ and K+ and regulated Na+/K+ balance under salt stress. The mechanism for transcriptional regulation of plant salt tolerance has attracted much attention in the scientific community. Transcription factors (TFs) are considered to be gene switches, which activate or inhibit the expression of downstream stress-related genes by binding to specific cis-acting elements on promoters and forming a complex gene regulatory network to alleviate the damage caused by abiotic stress (Hoang et al., 2017). Many TFs are involved in regulating the response and adaptation of plants to salt stress, including WRKY (Li et al., 2019a), MYB (Du et al., 2018), AP2/ERF (Zhao et al., 2019a), NAC (Li et al., 2021). Plants respond to osmotic stress by accumulating a large number of osmolytes under high salinity conditions, these osmolytes generally include proline, sugar alcohols, sorbitol, and quaternary ammonium compounds (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Liu et al. (2015) found that the overexpression of AtbHLH112 in Arabidopsis activated the expression of P5CS and inhibited the expressions of the P5CDH and ProDH genes, thus increasing proline synthesis while reducing its degradation. The increased proline content contributes to better abiotic stress tolerance of Arabidopsis.

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a global staple edible oil and food crop, which also provides the raw material for the manufacture of animal feeds. Salt stress adversely affects the growth of soybean plants, which leads to reduced yields. At present, many key genes related to salt tolerance have been identified in soybeans. The CHX-type ion transport protein GmSALT3 improves the salt tolerance of soybean plants by promoting Na+ and Cl exclusion (Qu et al., 2021). The salt tolerance of soybean hairy roots and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmCHX20a decreases, promoting the absorption and accumulation of Na+ in roots be due to GmCHX20a, while GmCHX1 (GmSALT3) was shown to protect transgenic Arabidopsis plants via Na+ exclusion under salt treatments (Jia et al., 2021). The expression level of the MYB transcription factor GmMYB84 was up-regulated under salt stress, and the overexpression of GmMYB84 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic soybeans (Zhang et al., 2020a). Salt-induced soybean NAC transcription factor, GmSIN1, promoted root growth and enhanced salt tolerance by controlling abscisic acid production and ROS (Li et al., 2019b). However, as there are limited genetic resources to improve soybean genetics these require further study.

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance is a prerequisite for the development of salt-tolerant crop varieties, and technological advances can help to clarify the complex mechanisms of plant response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis is a powerful tool to uncover stress-related regulatory networks in plants. It is widely used to identify stress-responsive genes and genetic control elements. A large number of salt-induced genes have been identified in oilseed rape (Yong et al., 2014), rice (Zhou et al., 2016), watermelon (Song, Joshi & Joshi, 2020a), kenaf (Munsif et al., 2020), and maize (Chen et al., 2021b). Ali et al. (2012) found that soybeans responded to salt stress through abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis based on tag sequence data combined with GO analysis. Zhao et al. (2019a) identified differentially expressed genes through transcriptome analysis, including Glyma.02G228100, Glyma.03G226000, Glyma.03G031000, Glyma.03G031400, Glyma.04G180300, Glyma.04G180400, Glyma.05G204600, Glyma.08G189600, Glyma.13G042200, and Glyma.17G17320, which were considered to be the key genes involved in the salt tolerance mechanism in salt-tolerant soybeans. It is generally believed that plants sense salt stress mainly through their roots, but high salinity may lead to physiological changes such as growth inhibition, leaf wilting, excessive accumulation of ROS in leaves, and increased Na+ content. However, the molecular mechanism of plant shoots (especially leaves) in response to salt stress is not well-established. In this study, the shoot (including stems and leaves) of soybean seedlings was used for transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing, RNA-seq), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment combined with other bioinformatics methods were used to identify key pathways and genes induced by salt stress. This study will provide data for the investigation of molecular mechanisms of the salt response in soybeans and cultivation of salt-resistant varieties.

Materials and Methods

Plant growth and salt treatment

Cultivated soybean seeds (Tianlong No. 1) were sterilized with 75% ethanol for 10 min, washed with sterile distilled water, and laid on wet filter paper for two days. The germinated seeds were transferred to quartz sand and irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution, then cultured in a plant growth chamber (16 h day/8 h night, 25 ± 2 °C, 60–70% relative humidity). After 10 d, soybean seedlings with consistent growth were selected and divided into two groups: seedlings irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution as control, and those irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution containing 120 mM NaCl as the treatment. The shoots (stems and leaves) were obtained after being treated for 6 h and were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for transcriptome sequencing. The control group and treatment group each contained three biological replicates.

Phenotypic comparison and physiological measurements

Histochemical staining with NBT (Nitrotetrazolium blue chloride) and DAB (3, 3-Diaminobenzidine) was used to examine the ROS (O2 and H2O2) accumulation levels in the leaves (He et al., 2019). After 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h salt treatment, the leaves were removed and immersed in DAB and NBT staining solution. Chlorophyll was removed with alcohol for photography after 12 h at room temperature. After 6 days of salt treatment, plant phenotypes were analyzed and compared, and physiological indexes related to salt stress (including plant height, fresh weight per plant, proline content, Na+, and K+ ion content) were determined as previously reported (Zhang et al., 2020b).

RNA isolation, cDNA library preparation, and Illumina sequencing

The total RNA was isolated from soybean shoot samples using a mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, AM1561) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The contained DNA was digested with DNase I. The quality and concentration of RNA was detected using Agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA), respectively. The mRNA in the total RNA was enriched using magnetic beads with Oligo (dT), and approximately 4 µg mRNA was collected from each sample for library construction using a TruSeq Stranded mRNA LTSample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The libraries were then sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platform (Illumina HiSeqTM 2500). The raw reads generated in this study were deposited in the NCBI database under accession number PRJNA741583.

Validation by qRT-PCR analysis

The expression of 10 randomly selected genes was evaluated by qRT-PCR analysis to validate the transcriptome data. This selection included 5 up-regulated genes (LOC100807235, LOC100816551, LOC100785783, LOC100787314, LOC100795929) and 5 down-regulated genes (LOC100805378, LOC102663255, LOC100306125, LOC100787705, LOC100819491). qRT-PCR was conducted using Bio-Rad CFX96 PCR System (USA, Bio-Rad) with a 20 µL reaction mixture. The mixture consisted of 10 µL HieffTM qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (No Rox Plus) (11201ES, Yeasen, Shanghai, China), 0.5 µL (10 µM) Primer F, 0.5 µL (10 µM) Primer R, and 9 µL (100 ng/µL) diluted cDNA. Relative expression of the genes was analyzed with the 2−ΔΔCt method using the GmEF-1 α gene as an internal control to normalize the level of gene expression (Zhao et al., 2020). The primers for qRT-PCR analysis were designed using the Primer Blast tool on the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). All primers used in this study are shown in Table S1.

RNA-Seq analysis

The transcriptome sequencing was conducted by OE Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Raw reads containing ploy-N and the low-quality reads were filtered to obtain the clean reads using Trimmomatic software (Bolger, Lohse & Usadel, 2014). The clean reads were mapped to the cultivated soybean (Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.) genome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/5?genome_assembly_id=401179). The Q20, Q30, and GC content from the clean read data were calculated and used to evaluate all samples’ sequencing quality. All further analyses were based on high-quality data from clean reads. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the repeatability of three biological replicates in the same group.

The gene expression levels were normalized to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) using Cufflinks v2.2.2 software. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing the read counts of the control and salt-treated samples’ gene transcripts using the DESeq R package function’s estimate size factors and nbinom tests (Anders & Huber, 2010). The p-value < 0.05 and —log2 fold change— > 1 or p-value < 0.01 and —log2 fold change— > 1.5 were set as the threshold for significantly differential expression (Long et al., 2019).

KEGG pathways’ enrichment of DEGs was determined using KOBAS software with FDR < 0.01. All of the genes annotated as transcription factors in DEGs were screened to identify the response of transcription factors to salt stress in soybean shoots.

Phylogenetic analysis of MYB family members

Some members of the MYB families reportedly involved in plant abiotic stress were retrieved from the NCBI database, and phylogenetic analysis was conducted with the corresponding family members in the salt-treated soybeans’ DEGs. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA X (Zhang et al., 2018). The FPKM values of 17 differentially expressed MYBs were used to draw the heatmap using TBtools (v1.0983) (Chen et al., 2020).

Expression pattern and subcellular localization of GmMYB46

Ten-day old soybean seedlings were treated with 120 mM NaCl or 300 mM Mannitol. The leaves were removed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h, quick-frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction and detection of GmMYB46 expression pattern using semi-quantitative PCR. The CDS removed the stop codon of GmMYB46, which was cloned and ligated into the pCAMBIA1300-GFP vector to obtain a fusion expression vector GmMYB46:eGFP. This vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 before the positive A. tumefaciens was injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plants were cultured for 2 d. The GFP fluorescence was observed and imaged using a laser confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM880 Meta, Jena, Germany).

Salt tolerance analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis

The full-length CDS sequence of GmMYB46 was cloned to construct the overexpressed vector 35S:GmMYB46 and the wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 was transformed using the floral dip method by Agrobacterium-mediated. The transgenic lines were identified by hygromycin resistance screening and semi-quantitative PCR. The seeds were evenly sown on nutrient-rich soil, kept in the dark at 4 °C for 3 d, and then placed in a growth chamber for 10 d. The control group (CK) was irrigated with deionized water for culturing, and the treatment group (NaCl) was irrigated with 150 mM NaCl solution. The phenotype was observed and photographed after 5 d and 7 d of treatment, and physiological indicators (survival rate, relative water content, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, proline content, SOD, and POD activities) were measured on day seven, following previously reported methods (Chen et al., 2019; He et al., 2019). The leaves were removed for RNA extraction 12 h after salt treatment, qRT-PCR analysis of salt stress-related genes was performed, and AtACTIN2 was used as an internal reference using the same methods as noted above.

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (v20.0, NY, USA). Means ± SD are shown in this study (n ≥ 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate P-values (P < 0.05) to determine the significance of the differences among treatments.

Results

Salt injury in soybean shoots exposed to high salinity

To observe the effect of salt stress on the growth of soybean shoots, 10-day-old soybean seedlings were selected for salt treatment. NBT and DAB staining results showed that the contents of H2O2 and O2 in leaves were significantly higher than those at 0 h and 3 h after salt treatment for 6 h and 12 h (Fig. 1A), indicating that excessive ROS had been generated and accumulated in plant leaves at 6 h salt treatment. Therefore, the 6 h salt-treated plants were used for transcriptome sequencing. The phenotypic comparison showed that the growth of soybean seedlings after 6 d of salt treatment was significantly inhibited, and plant height and fresh weight were lower than those of the control (CK) (Figs. 1B, 1C, 1D). In addition, the content of Na+ in shoots of salt-treated soybean seedlings increased significantly and K+ decreased compared with CK (Figs. 1E, 1F). Compared with CK, a large amount of proline accumulated in the shoot of the salt-treated soybean (Fig. 1G).

Figure 1. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological indicators of soybean seedlings.

Figure 1

(A) After salt treatment (0, 3, 6, 12 h), the accumulation of O2 and H2O2 in leaves was detected by NBT and DAB staining, respectively, (B) phenotypic changes of soybean seedlings after treatment with 100 mM NaCl for 6 days, (C) plant height, (D) fresh weight, (E) Na+ content and (F) K+ content in shoots, and (G) proline content under normal (CK) and salt treatment conditions. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 6), *P < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

Transcriptome analyses

RNA-Seq analysis was performed on seedlings treated with 0 mM (CK) and 120 mM NaCl for 6 h. We constructed six libraries from the control and NaCl treatment groups (three biological replicates in each group) for analysis using RNA-Seq. These libraries yielded 50.05 to 58.13 million raw reads, and 48.85 to 56.88 million clean reads (Table 1). The Q30 in each library was greater than 92%, indicating that the quality of the sequencing data could be used for further analysis. Approximately 98% of the clean reads were mapped to the soybean genome. Correlation analysis revealed that the relationships among the three biological replicates in the same group were more closely related (Fig. 2A). The volcano plot showed that 466 genes were up-regulated and 769 genes were down-regulated after salt treatment based on the loose DEGs restrictions (p < 0.05, —Log2 fold change— > 1) (Fig. 2B, Table S2). However, stricter parameters revealed (p < 0.01, —Log2 fold change— > 1.5) 425 DEGs, including 127 up-regulated and 298 down-regulated genes (Table S3). Transcriptome data was verified by qRT-PCR analysis and showed that the fold variation between RNA-seq expression and qRT-PCR analyses were linearly correlated (R2 = 0.8568) (Fig. 2C).

Table 1. Original RNA-seq data and quality control analysis.

Sample Raw reads (M) Clean reads (M) Q30 (%) Total reads Total mapped reads
CK-1 50.49 49.3 93.26 49300196 48248935 (97.87%)
CK-2 50.05 48.85 93.52 48851760 47818910 (97.89%)
CK-3 58.13 56.88 92.85 56884250 55613843 (97.77%)
NaCl-1 52.01 50.88 93.04 50878700 49752466 (97.79%)
NaCl-2 50.2 49.11 93.02 49105610 48029838 (97.81%)
NaCl-3 56.17 54.94 92.89 54943854 53713686 (97.76%)
Total 317.05 309.96

Figure 2. RNA-seq analysis of soybean shoots under salt stress.

Figure 2

(A) Correlation analysis of control (CK) and salt-treated samples (NaCl), (B) volcano plot of DEGs. Red dots indicate up-regulated genes and blue dots indicate down-regulated genes. (C) Correlations in qRT-PCR (x-axis) RNA-seq data (y-axis) using 10 randomly selected DEGs.

KEGG enrichment analysis of up- and down-regulated DEGs was conducted using the KOBAS database. The top 20 most highly enriched pathways were displayed (Fig. 3). The up-regulated DEGs induced by salt treatment were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ (34), ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’ (4), ‘Fructose and mannose metabolism’ (6), ‘Carotenoid biosynthesis’ (4), and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ (8) (Fig. 3A). The down-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ (25), ‘Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes’ (9), ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ (13), ‘Plant-pathogen interaction’ (15), and ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ (6) (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis of DEGs in response to salt stress using the top twenty significant enrichment KEGG terms.

Figure 3

(A) KEGG terms enriched by up-regulated DEGs, (B) KEGG terms enriched by down-regulated DEGs.

Key genes in early response to salt stress

The up- and down-regulated DEGs can be divided into the following five categories in the KEGG database: Cellular Processes, Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, Metabolism, and Organismal Systems. Among them, the number of up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs is the largest in signal transduction categories, which belong to Environmental Information Processing, and include 34 and 29 genes, respectively (Table 2). The 34 up-regulated genes contain hormone-related proteins and PP2C family members, while down-regulated genes mainly include the ABA-related genes and probable xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein family members (Table S4). Environmental adaptation categories include four up-regulated genes and 15 down-regulated genes (Table 2, Table S5). Furthermore, seven genes from the ABA receptors PYL family enriched in both the plant hormone signal transduction pathway and the MAPK signaling pathway were significantly down-regulated, including LOC100788576, LOC100819216, LOC100804400, LOC100805378, LOC100792229, LOC100798803, and LOC100788199 (Figs. 4A, 4E). The PP2C (Phosphatase 2C) family genes downstream of PYL were significantly up-regulated and include LOC100793293, LOC100803764, LOC100807235, LOC100818568, LOC100776356, LOC100796161, and LOC100781388 (Figs. 4B, 4F). The expression levels of ABF family members downstream of SNF1-related protein kinase 2 (SNRK2), LOC100819313 and GmbZIP1, were significantly up-regulated (Fig. 4A). Proline dehydrogenase genes (PDH, LOC100797464, and LOC100799876) in the arginine and proline metabolic pathways were significantly down-regulated (Figs. 4C, 4G) The phenylalanine ammonia-lyase genes (GmPAL1.2, GmPAL1.3, GmPAL2.2, and GmPAL2.4) in the phenylalanine metabolism pathway were significantly up-regulated to promote the production of cinnamic acid (Figs. 4D, 4H), which is important for salt stress adaptation.

Table 2. Classification statistics for DEGs of up-regulated (UR) and down-regulated genes (DR) in salt-stressed soybean according to KEGG pathway analysis.

KEGG categories Number of UR Number of DR
Cellular Processes
Transport and catabolism 1 10
Environmental Information Processing
Signal transduction 34 29
Membrane transport 1 0
Genetic Information Processing
Translation 1 14
Folding, sorting and degradation 5 9
Transcription 0 5
Replication and repair 0 3
Metabolism
Nucleotide metabolism 3 3
Metabolism of terpenoids and Polyketides 7 11
Metabolism of other amino acids 2 8
Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins 2 4
Lipid metabolism 10 19
Energy metabolism 4 3
Carbohydrate metabolism 28 20
Biosynthesis of other secondary Metabolites 12 13
Amino acid metabolism 16 16
Organismal Systems
Environmental adaptation 4 15

Figure 4. Key KEGG pathways of related genes in response to salt stress and salt-induced expression patterns.

Figure 4

(A) Plant hormone signal transduction, (B) MAPK signaling pathway, (C) arginine and proline metabolism, (D) phenylalanine metabolism, and (E–H) PYR/PYLs, PP2Cs, proline dehydrogenase genes, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression represented using the FPKM value.

Transcription factors (TFs) involved in salt stress

The differentially expressed TFs in DEGs were statistically analyzed, as shown in Fig. 5. We found that 1,235 DEGs contained a total of 116 transcription factor coding genes, accounting for 9.4% of DEGs. Of these, 49 were up-regulated and 67 were down-regulated. There were a large number of AP2/ERF, MYB, and bHLH families with 32, 17, and 14 differentially expressed TFs, respectively. Further analysis showed that the MYB family had the most members (11) in the up-regulated TFs, while the AP2/ERF family had the most members (26) in the down-regulated TFs. We searched MYB proteins that were reportedly involved in plant abiotic stress and conducted the phylogenetic analysis with MYB members in soybean DEGs. As shown in Fig. 6A, the up-regulated LOC778071 and SlMYB102 (Solyc02g079280) (Zhang et al., 2020c) were highly homologous and in the same clade; LOC100799410, MdMYB46 (XP_008363629) (Chen et al., 2019), and TaMYB86B (KM066946) (Song, Joshi & Joshi, 2020a) were in the same clade, and LOC100805341 and OsMYB2 (AK120551) (Yang, Dai & Zhang, 2012) were in the same clade. Further analysis showed that the expression level of LOC100799410 was the most up-regulated by salt stress (fold change = 7.49) (Fig. 6B). Therefore, for further functional exploration LOC100799410 was named GmMYB46 according to the results of phylogenetic analysis.

Figure 5. Differentially expressed TFs induced by salt stress in soybean.

Figure 5

(A) The classification and number of differentially expressed TFs, (B) classification of up-regulated and down-regulated TFs.

Figure 6. Phylogenetic analysis of differentially expressed MYB TFs, and expression pattern and subcellular localization of GmMYB46.

Figure 6

(A) The phylogenetic tree of differentially expressed MYBs and other reported MYBs involved in abiotic stress, (B) heatmap diagrams showing the relative expression levels of differentially expressed MYBs based on the FPKM values, (C) expression analysis of GmMYB46 induced by NaCl and mannitol, (D) subcellular localization of GmMYB46 in tobacco leaves.

GmMYB46 was up-regulated by salt treatment and localized in the nucleus

Semi-quantitative PCR analysis showed that the expression level of GmMYB46 was significantly increased in leaves treated with salt for 6 and 12 h, while the expression of GmMYB46 first increased (6 h) and then decreased (12 h) under mannitol treatment (Fig. 6C). In addition, the GFP fusion vector GmMYB46:eGFP was constructed and the transient expression was carried out in tobacco leaves. The results showed that green fluorescence was only observed in the nucleus of cells of GmMYB46:eGFP transformed leaves, indicating that GmMYB46 protein was localized in the nucleus (Fig. 6D).

Overexpression of GmMYB46 enhances the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis

An overexpression vector (35S:GmMYB46) was constructed to explore the function of GmMYB46 in plant salt tolerance, and transgenic Arabidopsis lines (OX46.1, OX46.2) were obtained (Figs. S1A, S1B). Phenotypic analysis showed that the growth of Arabidopsis seedlings was significantly inhibited by 150 mM NaCl treatment for 5 d and 7 d, but OX46.1 and OX46.2 plants were less affected by salt than WT (Col-0) (Fig. 7A). The survival rates of OX46.1 and OX46.2 were significantly higher than those of the WT after 5 and 7 d of salt treatment (Fig. 7B). In addition, the relative water content of OX46.1 and OX46.2 plants was significantly higher than that of WT (Fig. 7C), while the MDA content was significantly lower than that of WT under salt stress (Fig. 7D). The proline content and the activities of SOD and POD increased significantly, while the overexpressed lines were significantly higher than that of WT (Figs. 7E, 7F). In addition, we examined the expression of salt stress-related genes in normal and salt-treated Arabidopsis. The results showed that the expression level of P5CS1, a key gene for proline synthesis, was significantly up-regulated in Col-0, OX46.1, and OX46.2 plants induced by salt, and it was significantly higher in overexpressed lines than in WT (Fig. 8A). Antioxidant enzyme synthesis-related genes SOD, POD, and NCED3, a key gene for ABA biosynthesis, also showed a salt-induced expression pattern similar to P5CS1 (Figs. 8B, 8C, 8D).

Figure 7. Overexpression of GmMYB46 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis.

Figure 7

(A) Phenotypic analysis of wide-type (Col-0) and overexpressed lines (OX46.1 and OX46.2), (B) survival rate of Arabidopsis seedlings, (C) relative water content, (D) MDA content, (E) proline content, and (F) enzyme activities of SOD and POD. The data represent the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

Figure 8. Expression patterns of stress-responsive genes in Col-0 and overexpressed lines (OX46.1 and OX46.2) in response to salt stress.

Figure 8

The expression of (A) P5CS1, (B) SOD, (C) POD, and (D) NCED3 genes.

Discussion

Salt stress is one of the major environmental factors limiting plant growth and productivity. Plants have evolved complex physiological, biochemical, and molecular regulatory mechanisms to adapt to adverse conditions. These involve the expression changes of a large number of regulatory genes. Transcriptome sequencing is an effective tool for comprehensive analysis at the transcriptional level for plants under abiotic stress (Zhang et al., 2020b). There have been many studies on the transcriptome analysis of legumes using RNA-seq, including medicago (Shu et al., 2018), glycine (Sun et al., 2016), common bean (Hiz et al., 2014), and Arachis hypogaea (Zhang et al., 2020b). Sun et al. (2016) performed small RNA transcriptome analysis on root tip tissues of normal and salt-treated soybean seedlings and identified 66 salt-responsive miRNAs, and then demonstrated that salt-induced miR399 played an important role in regulating the developmental plasticity of soybean roots. Plant roots are known to directly encounter salinized soil as the first line of defense; accordingly, most studies have focused on the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the root response to salt stress (Zhang et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2020). However, these molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks have not been studied in plant shoots when growth is inhibited due to salt stress. Zeng et al. (2019) performed transcriptome sequencing on salt-treated soybean leaves, however only eight genes were preliminarily identified, and the function of these genes has not been explored in plants in their report. In contrast to previous work, shoot tissues (including stems and leaves) of salt-treated soybean seedlings were used for transcriptome sequencing in this study, which may better reflect the response of the above-ground parts of soybeans to salt stress. More importantly, transcriptome and bioinformatics analysis combined with Arabidopsis genetic transformation technique were used to preliminarily demonstrate the function of GmMYB46 in response to salt stress in our work.

We identified some important pathways and key candidate genes that may be involved in the salt stress response among 1,235 DEGs. Wu et al. (2017) conducted KEGG enrichment analysis of salt-induced DEGs and found ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ and other secondary metabolite pathways were significantly enriched. Tian et al. (2018) used KEGG analysis to determine that ‘Plant hormone signal transduction pathway’ was significantly enriched in both salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant Rosa chinensis. Similarly, our analysis found that DEGs were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’, ‘Arginine and proline Metabolism’ pathways (Fig. 3). These pathways play an important role in the process of plant salt stress response and the results provide a reference for salt tolerance genes in soybeans and assist in analyzing molecular regulatory mechanisms.

ABA is one of the most important salt stress hormones. It plays a crucial role in salt stress defense. ABA is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress, ion homeostasis, and the scavenging of reactive oxygen species induced by salt injury (Yu et al., 2020). It is widely believed that PYR/PYL protein, PP2Cs, and SnRK2 kinase constitute the core module of ABA signaling (PYL-PP2CS-SnRK2s), which is responsible for the earliest ABA signal recognition and transduction in plants (Gong et al., 2020). Liu et al. (2012) showed that overexpression of AtPP2CG1 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis by activating the expression of salt stress response genes RD29A, RD29B, DREB2A, and KIN1. In this study, we found that the ABA receptor PYL family genes significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ were significantly down-regulated, while PP2C family members were significantly up-regulated. Two downstream ABF family genes (LOC100819313 and GmbZIP1) were also significantly up-regulated (Fig. 4). Lei et al. (2021) conducted transcriptome sequencing of salt-treated Ricinus communis L. and found that PP2C genes were up-regulated in salt-treated cultivated R. communis, which inhibited the activity of SnRK2 kinase and further promoted the up-regulation of downstream ABF genes. The results in this work are consistent with previous reports, further confirming the function of the ABA signaling pathway PYL-PP2CS-SnRK2s in short-term salt stress. In addition, previous reports have shown that proline metabolism is an important pathway in response to oxidative stress caused by salt injury, and that the accumulation of proline is protective for plants (Verbruggen & Hermans, 2008). In this study, three key genes of the proline degradation pathway (PDH, LOC100797464, LOC100799876) were significantly down-regulated (Fig. 4), which reduce the degradation of proline in shoots and increase its accumulation in response to salt stress. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is a key enzyme in the phenylalanine pathway that catalyzes the deamination of phenylalanine to produce cinnamic acid. Some PAL genes (Aradu.IU1HH, Araip. 69J63, Araip.GM19P, and Araip.V9S7Z) in peanuts were significantly up-regulated under salt stress (Wanner et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2020b). Singh, Singh & Singh (2013) showed that cinnamic acid could reduce the accumulation of ROS in maize plants by providing ROS-scavenging enzymes under salt stress. We found that the expression levels of PAL family genes (GmPAL1.2, GmPAL1.3, GmPAL2.2, GmPAL2.4) were also significantly up-regulated in salt-treated soybeans (Fig. 4), indicating that these genes were involved in the response to salt stress. However, the means by which these genes exert their regulatory functions requires further study.

TFs are key regulatory factors in the complex signal network of plants in response to abiotic stress. The function of several TFs in the regulation of salt stress in plants has been reported, including that of AP2/ERF, MYB, bHLH, WRKY, and C2H2 (Ciftci-Yilmaz et al., 2007; Li et al., 2019a; Liu et al., 2015; Makhloufi et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2019b). In this study, 116 TFs were found in the differential genes by RNA-seq, accounting for 9.4% of the DEGs. These TFs were distributed among different families, including AP2/ERF, bZIP, NAC, MYB, BHLH, C3H, C2H2, HD-ZIP, and WRKY, etc. The AP2/ERF family has the largest number of members (32), followed by MYB (17) and bHLH (14) (Fig. 5). This is consistent with transcriptome analysis results from other species undergoing salt treatment. Long et al. (2019) found that the number of the AP2/ERF family members was largest among the DEGs treated with salt, accounting for 17.6%. Further analysis showed that MYB had the most members (11) in the up-regulated TFs (Fig. 5). Munsif et al. (2020) also found that the MYB family has the largest amount of up-regulated differentially expressed TFs in salt-treated isonuclear kenaf. Zhang et al. (2020c) showed that overexpression of SlMYB102 enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic tomatoes by regulating a series of molecular and physiological processes. OsMYB2-overexpressing transgenic rice plants were more tolerant than wild-type to salt stress (Yang, Dai & Zhang, 2012). Chen et al. (2019) showed that MdMYB46 can enhance the salt tolerance of apples by activating stress-related genes (MdABRE1A, MdDREB2a, MdRD22, and MdRD29A). TaMYB86B affects wheat’s salt tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis, maintaining osmotic balance, and reducing ROS levels (Song et al., 2020b). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that GmMYB46 (LOC100799410), MdMYB46, and TaMYB86B were highly homologous in the same clade (Fig. 6A). Analysis also showed that the expression level of the GmMYB46 gene was the highest up-regulated expression among all differentially expressed MYBs (Fig. 6B). Therefore, we believe that it is worth exploring the function of GmMYB46 under salt stress.

Further analysis revealed that the expression level of GmMYB46 first increased and then decreased under the treatment of mannitol compared with salt treatment (Fig. 6C). Plants first go through a rapid osmotic stress phase when exposed to salt in the environment before experiencing ion toxicity caused by salt stress (Zhao et al., 2019a). Mannitol treatment led to osmotic stress. The expression pattern of GmMYB46 suggesting that it may function in the early response to osmotic stress, and its longer response time to salt treatment indicated that it may play an important role in salt stress. The salt tolerance of Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 is significantly enhanced at 5 d and 7 d after salt treatment (Fig. 7). These results implied that GmMYB46 plays an important role in both short-term salt response and long-term salt stress tolerance. Chen et al. (2019) reported similar results and found that a short-term salt responsive gene, MdMYB46, in apples plays an important role in enhancing the long-term salt stress tolerance of transgenic apples. MDA content, as a product of membrane lipid peroxidation, reflects the degree of damage of plant cells due to abiotic stress, including salt stress (Song et al., 2019). We found that the MDA content of overexpressed lines under salt stress was significantly lower than that of WT (Fig. 7). The enhanced activity of SOD and POD helps plants reduce oxidative damage (Zhang et al., 2020d) and the proline content may reflect the stress resistance of plants. We found that the activity of SOD and POD, and the content of proline were significantly increased in overexpression lines compared with WT under salt stress (Fig. 7). In addition, the key genes for proline biosynthesis P5CS1 (Liu et al., 2015), and antioxidant enzymes SOD and POD encoding genes, were significantly up-regulated in the overexpression lines after salt treatment compared with WT (Fig. 8). NCED3, as a key gene in ABA synthesis (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020), was significantly upregulated under salt treatment, and the upregulated ratio in the overexpressed line was significantly higher than that in WT. These results further suggest that the regulation of GmMYB46 in the salt stress response is complex, and the detailed molecular regulatory mechanism requires additional study.

Conclusions

The shoots of control and salt-treated soybean seedlings were used for transcriptome sequencing to analyze their molecular mechanisms in response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed a total of 1,235 DEGs, of which 466 genes were up-regulated and 769 genes were down-regulated. The DEGs involved in important pathways were determined by KEGG enrichment, which included ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’, and ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’. We further analyzed the DEGs in these pathways to characterize their possible functions in responses to salt stress as well as TFs related to salt stress responses. The phylogenetic trees of differentially expressed MYBs induced by salt stress were constructed. The salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 was significantly enhanced, and GmMYB46 was found to activate the expression of salt stress response genes (P5CS1, SOD, POD, NCED3) in Arabidopsis under salt stress. This work will provide a basis for future studies to discover novel salt-tolerance genes, further investigate the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in soybeans, and cultivate strong salt resistant varieties.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Screening and identification of transgenic Arabidopsis.

(A) Schematic diagram of overexpression vector construction and selection of hygromycin-resistant plants. (B) Expression identification of GmMYB46 in WT and overexpression lines.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Primers used in this study.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. List of differentially expressed genes in soybean under salt stress (1235, p < 0.05; —Log2 fold change— > 1).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. List of differentially expressed genes in soybean under salt stress (425, p < 0.01; —Log2 fold change— > 1.5).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Differently expressed genes in ‘Signal transduction’ categorie KEGG Pathway Classification.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-5
Supplemental Information 6. Differently expressed genes in ‘Environmental adaptation’ categorie KEGG Pathway Classification.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-6
Supplemental Information 7. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 1C1G.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-7
Supplemental Information 8. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 2C.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-8
Supplemental Information 9. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 5.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-9
Supplemental Information 10. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 6B.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-10
Supplemental Information 11. Uncropped blots of Fig. 6C.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-11
Supplemental Information 12. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 7B7F.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-12
Supplemental Information 13. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 8A8D.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-13

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ4030), the Innovation Platform and Talent Plan of Hunan Province (2020NK4222). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xun Liu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Xinxia Yang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Bin Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

All sequences are available at NCBI: PRJNA741583.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary Files.

References

  • Ali et al. (2012).Ali Z, Zhang DY, Xu ZL, Xu L, Yi JX, He XL, Huang YH, Liu XQ, Khan AA, Trethowan RM, Ma HX. Uncovering the salt response of soybean by unraveling its wild and cultivated functional genomes using tag sequencing. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e48819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anders & Huber (2010).Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biology. 2010;11:R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolger, Lohse & Usadel (2014).Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2020).Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant. 2020;13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2021a).Chen XX, Ding YL, Yang YQ, Song CP, Wang BS, Yang SH, Guo Y, Gong ZZ. Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2021a;63:53–78. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2021b).Chen MX, Lu CC, Sun PC, Nie YX, Tian Y, Hu QJ, Das D, Hou XX, Gao B, Chen X, Liu SX, Zheng CC, Zhao XY, Dai L, Zhang JH, Liu YG. Comprehensive transcriptome and proteome analyses reveal a novel sodium chloride responsive gene network in maize seed tissues during germination. Plant Cell and Environment. 2021b;44:88–101. doi: 10.1111/pce.13849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2019).Chen KQ, Song MR, Guo YN, Liu LF, Xue H, Dai HY, Zhang ZH. MdMYB46 could enhance salt and osmotic stress tolerance in apple by directly activating stress-responsive signals. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2019;17:2341–2355. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciftci-Yilmaz et al. (2007).Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Morsy MR, Song LH, Coutu A, Krizek BA, Lewis MW, Warren D, Cushman J, Connolly EL, Mittler R. The EAR-motif of the Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein ZAT7 plays a key role in the defense response of Arabidopsis to salinity stress. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:9260–9268. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611093200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Du et al. (2018).Du YT, Zhao MJ, Wang CT, Gao Y, Wang YX, Liu YW, Chen M, Chen J, Zhou YB, Xu ZS, Ma YZ. Identification and characterization of GmMYB118 responses to drought and salt stress. BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18:320. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1551-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gong et al. (2020).Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Yang S, Herrera-Estrella LR, Xu G, Chao DY, Li J, Wang PY, Qin F, Li J, Ding Y, Shi Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Guo Y, Zhu JK. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Science China Life Sciences. 2020;63:635–674. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • He et al. (2019).He F, Li HG, Wang JJ, Su Y, Wang HL, Feng CH, Yang Y, Niu MX, Liu C, Yin W, Xia X. PeSTZ1, a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor from Populus euphratica, enhances freezing tolerance through modulation of ROS scavenging by directly regulating PeAPX2. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2019;17:2169–2183. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hiz et al. (2014).Hiz MC, Canher B, Niron H, Turet M. Transcriptome analysis of salt tolerant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under saline conditions. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e92598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoang et al. (2017).Hoang XLT, Nhi DNH, Thu NBA, Thao NP, Tran LSP. Transcription factors and their roles in signal transduction in plants under abiotic stresses. Current Genomics. 2017;18:483–497. doi: 10.2174/1389101918666170227150057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ji et al. (2013).Ji HT, Pardo JM, Batelli G, Van Oosten MJ, Bressan RA, Li X. The Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) Pathway: established and emerging roles. Molecular Plant. 2013;6:275–286. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jia et al. (2021).Jia Q, Li MW, Zheng C, Xu Y, Sun S, Li Z, Wong FL, Song J, Lin WW, Li Q, Zhu Y, Liang K, Lin W, Lam HM. The soybean plasma membrane-localized cation/H+ exchanger GmCHX20a plays a negative role under salt stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;171:714–727. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lei et al. (2021).Lei P, Liu Z, Hu YB, Kim H, Liu S, Liu JQ, Xu LP, Li JX, Zhao Y, Yu ZL, Qu YT, Huang FL, Meng FJ. Transcriptome analysis of salt stress responsiveness in the seedlings of wild and cultivated Ricinus communis L. Journal of Biotechnology. 2021;327:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2021).Li M, Chen R, Jiang QY, Sun XJ, Zhang H, Hu Z. GmNAC06, a NAC domain transcription factor enhances salt stress tolerance in soybean. Plant Molecular Biology. 2021;105:333–345. doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-01091-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2019a).Li Z, Li L, Zhou KH, Zhang YH, Han X, Din YP, Ge XY, Qin WQ, Wang P, Li FG, Ma ZY, Yang ZE. GhWRKY6 acts as a negative regulator in both transgenic Arabidopsis and cotton during drought and salt stress. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019a;10:392. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2019b).Li S, Wang N, Ji DD, Zhang WX, Wang Y, Yu YC, Zhao SZ, Lyu MH, You JJ, Zhang YY, Wang LL, Wang XF, Liu ZH, Tong JH, Xiao LT, Bai MY, Xiang FN. A GmSIN1/GmNCED3s/GmRbohBs feed-forward loop acts as a signal amplifier that regulates root growth in soybean exposed to salt stress. The Plant Cell. 2019b;31:2107–2130. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liang et al. (2018).Liang WJ, Ma XL, Wan P, Liu LY. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: a review. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2018;495:286–291. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2015).Liu YJ, Ji XY, Nie XG, Qu M, Zheng L, Tan ZL, Zhao HM, Huo L, Liu SN, Zhang B, Wang YC. Arabidopsis AtbHLH112 regulates the expression of genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance by binding to their E-box and GCG-box motifs. New Phytologist. 2015;207:692–709. doi: 10.1111/nph.13387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2012).Liu X, Zhu YM, Zhai H, Cai H, Ji W, Luo X, Li J, Bai X. AtPP2CG1, a protein phosphatase 2C, positively regulates salt tolerance of Arabidopsis in abscisic acid-dependent manner. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;422:710–715. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Long et al. (2019).Long L, Yang WW, Liao P, Guo YW, Kumar A, Gao W. Transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed ERF transcription factors associated with salt response in cotton. Plant Science. 2019;281:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Makhloufi et al. (2014).Makhloufi E, Yousfi FE, Marande W, Mila I, Hanana M, Berges H, Mzid R, Bouzayen M. Isolation and molecular characterization of ERF1, an ethylene response factor gene from durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum), potentially involved in salt-stress responses. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65:6359–6371. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Munsif et al. (2020).Munsif F, Kong XJ, Khan A, Shah TR, Arif M, Jahangir M, Akhtar K, Tang DF, Zheng J, Liao XF, Faisal S, Ali I, Iqbal A, Ahmad P, Zhou RY. Identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways in isonuclear kenaf genotypes under salt stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 2020 doi: 10.1111/ppl.13253. Epub ahead of print 2020 02 November. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nieves-Cordones et al. (2010).Nieves-Cordones M, Aleman F, Martinez V, Rubio F. The Arabidopsis thaliana HAK5 K+ transporter is required for plant growth and K+ acquisition from low K+ solutions under saline conditions. Molecular Plant. 2010;3:326–333. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Qu et al. (2021).Qu Y, Guan R, Bose J, Henderson SW, Wege S, Qiu L, Gilliham M. Soybean CHX-type ion transport protein GmSALT3 confers leaf Na+ exclusion via a root derived mechanism, and Cl− exclusion via a shoot derived process. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2021;44:856–869. doi: 10.1111/pce.13947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ren et al. (2005).Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Genetics. 2005;37:1141–1146. doi: 10.1038/ng1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schachtman & Schroeder (1994).Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI. Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher-plants. Nature. 1994;370:655–658. doi: 10.1038/370655a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi et al. (2002).Shi HZ, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. The Plant Cell. 2002;14:465–477. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shu et al. (2018).Shu YJ, Li W, Zhao JY, Liu Y, Guo CH. Transcriptome sequencing and expression profiling of genes involved in the response to abiotic stress in Medicago ruthenica. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2018;41:638–648. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-Gmb-2017-0284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh, Singh & Singh (2013).Singh PK, Singh R, Singh S. Cinnamic acid induced changes in reactive oxygen species scavenging enzymes and protein profile in maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown under salt stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2013;19:53–59. doi: 10.1007/s12298-012-0126-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song, Joshi & Joshi (2020a).Song QS, Joshi M, Joshi V. Transcriptomic analysis of short-term salt stress response in watermelon seedlings. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020a;21:6036. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song et al. (2019).Song YS, Li JL, Liu ML, Meng Z, Liu KC, Sui N. Nitrogen increases drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Functional Plant Biology. 2019;46:350–359. doi: 10.1071/Fp18186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song et al. (2020b).Song Y, Yang W, Fan H, Zhang X, Sui N. TaMYB86B encodes a R2R3-type MYB transcription factor and enhances salt tolerance in wheat. Plant Science. 2020b;300:110624. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2016).Sun ZX, Wang YN, Mou FP, Tian YP, Chen L, Zhang SL, Jiang Q, Li X. Genome-wide small RNA analysis of soybean reveals auxin-responsive microRNAs that are differentially expressed in response to salt stress in root apex. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;6:1273. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tian et al. (2018).Tian XM, Wang ZY, Zhang Q, Ci HC, Wang PS, Yu L, Jia GX. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the salt stress tolerance mechanism in Rosa chinensis. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0200938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink (2020).Van Zelm E, Zhang YX, Testerink C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2020;71:403–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbruggen & Hermans (2008).Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: a review. Amino Acids. 2008;35:753–759. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2020b).Wang Z, Hong YC, Zhu GT, Li YM, Niu QF, Yao JJ, Hua K, Bai JJ, Zhu YF, Shi HZ, Huang SW, Zhu JK. Loss of salt tolerance during tomato domestication conferred by variation in a Na+/K+ transporter. EMBO Journal. 2020b;39:e103256. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019103256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2020a).Wang YF, Liao YQ, Wang YQ, Yang JW, Zhang N, Si HJ. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of StPP2C gene family in response to multiple stresses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2020a;19:1609–1624. doi: 10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63181-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wanner et al. (1995).Wanner LA, Li GQ, Ware D, Somssich IE, Davis KR. The phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology. 1995;27:327–338. doi: 10.1007/Bf00020187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2017).Wu B, Hu YN, Huo PJ, Zhang Q, Chen X, Zhang ZW. Transcriptome analysis of hexaploid hulless oat in response to salinity stress. PLOS ONE. 2017;12:e0171451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang, Dai & Zhang (2012).Yang A, Dai XY, Zhang WH. A R2R3-type MYB gene, OsMYB2, is involved in salt, cold, and dehydration tolerance in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012;63:2541–2556. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yong et al. (2014).Yong HY, Zou ZW, Kok EP, Kwan BH, Chow K, Nasu S, Nanzyo M, Kitashiba H, Nishio T. Comparative transcriptome analysis of leaves and roots in response to sudden increase in salinity in Brassica napus by RNA-seq. Biomed Research International. 2014;2014:467395. doi: 10.1155/2014/467395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2020).Yu ZP, Duan XB, Luo L, Dai SJ, Ding ZJ, Xia GM. How plant hormones mediate salt stress responses. Trends in Plant Science. 2020;25:1117–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng et al. (2019).Zeng AL, Chen PY, Korth KL, Ping JQ, Thomas J, Wu CJ, Srivastava S, Pereira A, Hancock F, Brye K, Ma JX. RNA sequencing analysis of salt tolerance in soybean (Glycine max) Genomics. 2019;111:629–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2020c).Zhang X, Chen L, Shi Q, Ren Z. SlMYB102, an R2R3-type MYB gene, confers salt tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Science. 2020c;291:110356. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2018).Zhang B, Liu J, Yang ZE, Chen EY, Zhang CJ, Zhang XY, Li FG. Genome-wide analysis of GRAS transcription factor gene family in Gossypium hirsutum L. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:348. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4722-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2016).Zhang J, Wang J, Jiang W, Liu J, Yang S, Gai J, Li Y. Identification and analysis of NaHCO3 stress responsive genes in wild soybean (Glycine soja) roots by RNA-seq. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1842. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2020d).Zhang P, Wang RL, Yang XP, Ju Q, Li WQ, Lu SY, Tran LSP, Xu J. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor AtMYB49 modulates salt tolerance in Arabidopsis by modulating the cuticle formation and antioxidant defence. Plant Cell and Environment. 2020d;43:1925–1943. doi: 10.1111/pce.13784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2020a).Zhang WX, Wang N, Yang JT, Guo H, Liu ZH, Zheng XJ, Li S, Xiang FN. The salt-induced transcription factor GmMYB84 confers salinity tolerance in soybean. Plant Science. 2020a;291:110326. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2020b).Zhang H, Zhao XB, Sun QX, Yan CX, Wang J, Yuan CL, Li CJ, Shan SH, Liu FZ. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals molecular defensive mechanism of Arachis hypogaea in response to salt stress. International Journal of Genomics. 2020b;2020:6524093. doi: 10.1155/2020/6524093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2020).Zhao LJ, Cui JJ, Cai YY, Yang SN, Liu JG, Wang W, Gai JY, Hu ZB, Li Y. Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting soybean varieties in response to aluminum toxicity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:4316. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2019b).Zhao YY, Yang ZE, Ding YP, Liu LS, Han X, Zhan JJ, Wei X, Diao YY, Qin WQ, Wang P, Liu PP, Sajjad M, Zhang XL, Ge XY. Over-expression of an R2R3 MYB gene, GhMYB73, increases tolerance to salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Science. 2019b;286:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou et al. (2016).Zhou Y, Yang P, Cui FL, Zhang FT, Luo XD, Xie JK. Transcriptome analysis of salt stress responsiveness in the seedlings of Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0146242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2019a).Zhao MJ, Yin LJ, Liu Y, Ma J, Zheng JC, Lan JH, Fu JD, Chen M, Xu ZS, Ma YZ. The ABA-induced soybean ERF transcription factor gene GmERF75 plays a role in enhancing osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis and soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 2019a;19:506. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2066-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Screening and identification of transgenic Arabidopsis.

(A) Schematic diagram of overexpression vector construction and selection of hygromycin-resistant plants. (B) Expression identification of GmMYB46 in WT and overexpression lines.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Primers used in this study.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. List of differentially expressed genes in soybean under salt stress (1235, p < 0.05; —Log2 fold change— > 1).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. List of differentially expressed genes in soybean under salt stress (425, p < 0.01; —Log2 fold change— > 1.5).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Differently expressed genes in ‘Signal transduction’ categorie KEGG Pathway Classification.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-5
Supplemental Information 6. Differently expressed genes in ‘Environmental adaptation’ categorie KEGG Pathway Classification.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-6
Supplemental Information 7. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 1C1G.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-7
Supplemental Information 8. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 2C.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-8
Supplemental Information 9. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 5.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-9
Supplemental Information 10. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Fig. 6B.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-10
Supplemental Information 11. Uncropped blots of Fig. 6C.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-11
Supplemental Information 12. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 7B7F.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-12
Supplemental Information 13. Raw data applied for data analyses and preparation for Figs. 8A8D.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12492/supp-13

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES