Table 2.
Comprehensive description of the function of the direct and indirect pathway, organized by type of experiment.
dSPNs | iSPNs | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|
Optogenetic activation | Increase in spontaneous locomotion and movement velocity; causes form of dyskinesia that altered overall performance in the lever press task (at least for DLS) | Increase in freezing and decrease movement velocity; ipsilateral turns | [96–98,118] |
Mild delay in initiation of movement | Abolish first half of a motor sequence | [103] | |
Slow initiation as the animal switched to other behaviors (and slow performance) | Aborted initiation as the animal switched to other behaviors (and affected performance) | [101] | |
Optogenetic activation prior to reversal learning | Contralateral bias | Ipsilateral bias | [113] |
Optogenetic activation during outcome presentation (in DMS) | Reduced switches following reward | Increase switches after unrewarded trials | [102] |
Optogenetic activation during learning | Reinforces behavior and/or spatial preference paired with stimulation; reinforces velocity or other features of trained movements | Reduces performance of stimulation-paired behavior; increases aversion for a spatial location; reduces velocity of movement | [117,118] |
Optogenetic inhibition | Affected movement initiation; increased probability that the animal disengages from the task | Affected movement initiation | [101] |
Slows action initiation | No changes in action initiation | [103] | |
Electrophysiology combined with optogenetic tagging (DLS only) | Sequence related sustained firing activity during action execution | Sequence related inhibited firing activity during action execution | [107] |
Portion of both (~ 40%) active during initiation and/or termination of movements | |||
Electrophysiology combine with optogenetic tagging (DMS only) | Both involved in element-level action execution | [103] | |
More active after change in strategy | |||
Fluorescent calcium indicators | Both active during movement and less during immobility (particularly in contralateral inward movements); similarly active during training; both encode velocity; coactive specifically predicting movement initiation | [94,97,99,101–102,105,111] | |
Simultaneous photometry recording of dSPNs and iSPNs | Both encode the sequences of spontaneous motor behaviors (activation of both pathways necessary for action selection). Both similarly selective for similar actions | [112] | |
Single-cell recording | Similar activity clustering in regard to spatiotemporal features of the movement | [109] | |
Lesion of the DLS (and partially DMS) | More likely to signal sequence initiation and termination | Preferentially encodes the transition between sequences | [103] |
DLS inhibition during reward-based lever press task | Critical for completion of responses in serial order (without affecting reversal learning) | Behavior not affected, except for a transient improvement on second step of the task | [176] |
In DMS | No effect on rotarod performance; stimulates novel object recognition, more active during rewarded presentation; D1 availability correlates with instrumental learning bias from rewarded trials | Affects early training performance on rotarod; inhibits novel object recognition; important to inhibit competing actions; disengages in later stages of learning; modulates dSPNs inhibiting previously learned commands and allow new goal-directed learning; more active during unrewarded outcomes | [96,108,109,113,128] |
In DLS | Active in late stages of learning; necessary for performance in early and late learning; necessary to develop novel strategy and habit learning | iMSNs active in early skill learning | [102] |
D1R or D2R KO on rotarod | Decreased performance, later improved | Good performance at early training, without any improvement. Poorer performance if animals exposed to high speed first | [133] |
D1R antagonist | Lower motor ability at high speed of treadmill, not related to changes in reward sensitivity | No changes |