Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 11;115:113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.10.021

Table 2.

Main international edges. Top 25 Largest variations. In bold: short distance.

Largest positive variations

Largest negative variations

Port 1 Port 2 Weighted degree variation rate Port 1 Port 2 Weighted degree variation rate
Gwangyang, KR Shanghai, CN 453% Buenaventura, CO Callao, PE −55%
Port Qasim, PK Mundra, IN 432% Jebel Ali, AE Mumbai, IN −48%
Yokohama, JP Manzanillo, MX 196% San Antonio, CL Callao, PE −46%
Qingdao, CN Gwangyang, KR 192% Busan, KR Hong Kong, HK −44%
Yantian, CN Los Angeles, US 158% Rotterdam, NL Colombo, LK −41%
Gwangyang, KR Ningbo, CN 139% Felixstowe, GB Singapore, SG −39%
Singapore, SG Rotterdam, NL 132% Kaohsiung, TW Busan, KR −39%
Tema, GH Lome, TG 112% Ningbo, CN Taipei, TW −38%
Incheon, KR Dalian, CN 109% Jebel Ali, AE Port Klang, MY −34%
Piraeus, GR Port Said, EG 85% Port Klang, MY Mumbai, IN −34%
Gioia Tauro, IT Kulayyah, SA 55% Rotterdam, NL Felixstowe, GB −34%
Tanger Med, MA Algeciras, ES 55% Genova, IT Barcelona, ES −34%
Rotterdam, NL Southampton, UK 50% Le Havre, FR Rotterdam, NL −34%
Singapore, SG Kobe, JP 50% Buenos Aires, AR Rio Grande, BR −33%
Valencia, ES Gioia Tauro, IT 48% Lazaro Cardenas, MX Balboa, PA −32%
Port Klang, MY Qingdao, CN 47% Jebel Ali, AE Karachi, PK −31%
Brisbane, AU Singapore, SG 40% Kaohsiung, TW Qingdao, CN −30%
Sines, PT Antwerpen, BE 39% Colon, PA New York, US −30%
Shanghai, CN Long Beach, US 39% Balboa, PA Buenaventura, CO −28%
Port Said, EG Kulayyah, SA 37% Kaohsiung, TW Shenzhen, CN −28%
Buenaventura, CO Guayaquil, EC 36% Felixstowe, GB Antwerpen, BE −27%
Jebel Ali, AE Mundra, IN 34% Valencia, ES Tanger Med, MA −27%
Yantian, CN Singapore, SG 34% Southampton, GB Le Havre, FR −27%
Felixstowe, GB Hamburg, DE 33% Marseille, FR Valencia, ES −26%
Mundra, IN Karachi, PK 31% Long Beach, US Busan, KR −26%