Table 3.
Predicted IPs resulting from (a) filtration efficiency, (b) mask wearing and (c) ventilation rate changes to scenario parameters for Scenario 1 with index patient located in seat 6C.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13–17 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Scenario 1 with ventilation filtration efficiency of 100 %1 | F | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| D | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| C | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 10.0 |  |
0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| B | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 8.2 | 25.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| A | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 7.2 | 11.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| (b) Scenario 1 with 90% of passengers wearing face coverings | F | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| D | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| C | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 6.1 | |
0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| B | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 15.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| A | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 7.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| (c) Scenario 1 with air change rate of 14 ACH | F | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| D | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | |
| C | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 8.4 | |
2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | |
| B | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 8.0 | 10.9 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
| A | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
1IPs less than 0.05% are presented as 0.0.