Table 1.
TELEMERGENCY | |||
---|---|---|---|
MOTIVES | BENEFITS | BARRIERS | SOLUTIONS |
1. Maintain or bolster access to ED care within rural communities | Local ED care remained in all communities using TelEmergency without a reduction in the volume of care provided. | Scope of NPs previously limited to physician oversight within 15 miles. | UMMC obtained a waiver of this requirement for TelEmergency from relevant MS oversight authorities. |
2. Enhance quality of ED care provided within rural communities | Increased access to EM-trained, board-certified physicians and specially trained NPs. | ||
Achieved a high-degree of satisfaction from patients and hospital administrators.18 | |||
3. Stabilize financial performance at financially fragile rural MS hospitals | None of the hospitals using TelEmergency closed. | Historically, telehealth reimbursement was restrictive, particularly for ED care. | A 2013 MS state-level telehealth parity law expanded telehealth reimbursement across all payers. |
a. Cut rural ED expenses (e.g., physician staffing, inventory management) | By coordinating ED care through the hub, fewer physicians were staffed. | ||
The TelEmergency inventory protocols decreased unnecessary inventory held. | |||
b. Concerns for cuts to CAH reimbursement | Improving the profitability of one service line, emergency care, eases concerns for CAH reimbursement changes. | ||
4. Mitigate financial investment by UMMC to achieve prior objectives | Stabilizing access to ED care through TelEmergency was one reason UMMC did not have to make substantial capital investments to acquire those rural hospitals, which may have otherwise closed. | ||
Led to better downstream population health management. |
CAH, critical access hospital; ED, emergency department; EM, emergency medicine; MS, Mississippi; NP, nurse practitioner; UMMC, University of Mississippi Medical Center.