Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 14;12(5):1847–1872.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.08.001

Table 3.

Details of Statistical Tests

Figure 1
 A Two-way ANOVA f(6, 52) = 2.766; P = .0208 J Unpaired t test P < .0001
 C One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 46) = 80.56; P < .0001
P < .0001
K Unpaired t test P = .7113
 D One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 47) = 57.41; P < .0001;
P < .0001
L Unpaired t test P = .5447
 F Unpaired t test P = .0338 M Unpaired t test P = .4881
 H One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(2, 390) = 5.936; P = .0029;
ZT12 P = .0030
O Unpaired t test P = .3793
 I Unpaired t test P = .1036
Figure 2
 B Unpaired t test P = .0012 J Unpaired t test P = .0013
 D Unpaired t test P = .0166 K Unpaired t test P < .0001
 F Two-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(2, 218) = 3.386; P = .0352
ZT4 P = .0246
L Unpaired t test P = .0123
 G Unpaired t test P = .031 N Unpaired t test P = .0005
 I Unpaired t test P = .1409 P Unpaired t test P < .0001
Panel Test Value
Figure 3
 C MetaCycle2d Nr1d1 (P = 4.9-08; q = 0.00039), Cry1 (P = 3.8-08; q = 0.00039), Bmp3 (P = .00012; q = 0.057), Ephb3 (P = 8.0-06; q = 0.0084), Kit (P = .00016; q = 0.067), Tead4 (P = 1.09-05; q = 0.0098)
 D Two-way ANOVA Nr1d1 (f(12, 37) = 5.993; P < .0001), Cry1 (f(1, 37) = 413.1; P < .0001), Tead4 (f(12, 37) = 15.36; P < .0001)
Figure 4
 D MetaCycle2d Golga (P = 1.20-06; q = 0.015),
Dolk (P = 2.83-06; q = 0.015), RNF128 (P = 5.81-06; q = 0.015), Mlxipl (P = 4.26-07; q = 0.0053), Msmo1 (P = 1.04-06; q = 0.0053), Fam76b (P = 1.44-06; q = 0.0055)
 E Two-way ANOVA Golga (f(12,26) = 8.393; P < .0001),
Dolk (f(12,26) = 3.557; P = .0033) RNF128 (f12, 25) = 3.284; P = .0058), Mlxipl (f(12,15) = 1.220; P = .3623), Msmo1(f12, 13) = 2.051; P = .1067), Fam76b (f(12, 26) = 6.062; P < .0001)
Panel Test Value Panel Test Value
Figure 5
 A Gene-wise 1-way ANOVA (4 genotypes) with BH correction
Gene-wise Tukey post-test (2 genotypes) with BH correction
f(3,84) > 2.75; P < .047; q < 0.05; P < .00357; q < 0.05 H Unpaired t test P = .0075
 B Gene-wise 1-way ANOVA (4 genotypes) with BH correction
Gene-wise Tukey post-test (2 genotypes) with BH correction
f(3,84) > 2.75; P < .047; q < 0.05; P < .02815; q < 0.05 K Unpaired t test P = .0444
 C GO analysis: DAVID 6.8 P < .0002; Benjamini < 0.05
Gene set > 9
L One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
Apcmin; Bmal1-/-DMSO vs Yap-i
f(3, 10) = 19.55; P = .0002; P = .0068
 D ES
NES
Nominal P value
FDR q-value
FWER P value
ES, 0.44; NES, 2.083; P = .000; q =0.000; P = .000 M. One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test:
DMSO vs DMSO
Apcmin; Bmal1-/-DMSO vs YAP
f(2,43) = 4.69; P = .0144; P = .0272; P = .0044
 G Unpaired t test P = .0004
Figure 6
 A One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3,8) = 11.48; P = .0026; P = .0029 D One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 16) = 8.420; P = .0014; P = .0217
 B Unpaired t test 0.9172 F One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 65) = 6.824; P = .005; P = .0182
 C Unpaired t test P = .027
Figure 7
 B Unpaired t test P = .0186 G One-way ANOVA
Sidak post-test
f(3, 36) = 9.241; P = .0001
P = .0096
 E Unpaired t test P = .0009 I One-way ANOVA
Sidak post-test
f(3, 36) = 9.422; P < .0001
P = .0064
 D Unpaired t test P = .027
Figure 8
 A Two-way ANOVA f(5, 168) = 12.01; P < .0001 H Two-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(2, 116) = 351.9; P < .0001
ZT4 P < .0001
ZT12 P < .0001
 C Two-way ANOVA f(5, 168) = 6.49; P < .0001 J Mixed-effect analysis
Sidak post-test
f(2, 27) = 127.4; P < .0001
ZT12 < 0.0001
 E Two-way ANOVA f(1, 168) = 25.50; P < .0001
Panel Test Value
Figure 9
 A Two-way ANOVA f(5, 168) = 2.50; P = .033
 C Two-way ANOVA f(5, 168) = 9.24; P = .0027
 E Two-way ANOVA f(1, 168) = 8.947; P = .0032
 G Two-way ANOVA f(1, 168) = 71.98; P < .0001
 I Two-way ANOVA f(1, 168) = 41.51; P < .0001
 K Two-way ANOVA F(5, 168) = 2.746; P = .02
Panel Test Value Panel Test Value
Figure 10
 B One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 20) = 20.58; P < .0001
P = .0027
G Unpaired t test P = .0341
 C One-way ANOVA
Tukey post-test
f(3, 20) = 28.71; P < .0001
P = .0014
I Unpaired t test P = .0447
 E Unpaired t test P = .0023

ANOVA, analysis of variance; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; ES, enrichment score; FDR, False Discovery Rate; FWER, Family-Wise Error Rate; NES, normalized enrichment score; Yap-i, Yap Inhibitor; ZT, Zeitgeber Time.