Jurubita 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No patient was lost to follow‐up, and an intention‐to‐treat analysis was used |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Only remission data were provided in the abstract |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Only abstract was available and unpublished data were not used |