Koshikawa 1993.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No sufficient detail about concealment of the random allocation sequence before or during enrolment of participants |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind; no information on blinding of outcome‐assessors provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only 2/48 patients in the treatment group did not complete 24‐week follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The primary outcome such as death and ESKD were not reported |
Other bias | High risk | The data were abstracted from a RCT aiming to investigate the effect of mizoribine on steroid‐resistant primary nephrotic syndrome. This study included all different pathologic variants of nephrotic syndrome. The randomisation was not stratified according to the pathologic diagnosis |