Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design: parallel, open‐label RCT
Study duration: January 2013 to April 2016
Duration of follow‐up: median observation period was 12 months (6 to 30 months)
|
Participants |
Setting: single centre
Country: China
Inclusion criteria: aged 18 to 75 years; confirmed as the onset IMN by kidney biopsy in our centre; nephrotic syndrome, which was defined as urinary protein excretion of 3.5 g/24 hours, and serum albumin of 30 g/L; initial SCr level of < 133 µmol/L; no immunosuppressive agents used in the previous 6 months
-
Baseline characteristics
Mean SBP/DBP ± SD (mm Hg): treatment group 1 (124.3 ± 16.0 / 76.4 ± 11.9); treatment group 2 (129.9 ± 16.3 / 81.9 ± 13.2)
Mean proteinuria ± SD (g/24 hours): treatment group 1 (5.9 ± 2.7); treatment group 2 (6.9 ± 2.2)
Mean serum albumin ± SD (g/L): treatment group 1 (26.5 ± 6.2); treatment group 2 (24.1 ± 6.2)
Mean eGFR ± SD (mL/min/1.73 m²): treatment group 1 (93.6 ± 21.7); treatment group 2 (87.9 ± 24.9)
Mean triglyceride ± SD (mmol/L): treatment group 1 (2.7 ± 1.8); treatment group 2 (3.1 ± 2.3)
Mean SCr ± SD (µmol/L): treatment group 1 (70.7 ± 17.5); treatment group 2 (81.0 ± 22.5)
Mean serum cholesterol ± SD (mmol/L): treatment group 1 (7.5 ± 2.0); treatment group 2 (8.8 ± 3.0)
Disease‐course (time since diagnosis) at immunosuppressive treatment initiation: not reported
-
Pathological classification
Co‐morbidities: not reported
Number: treatment group 1(30); treatment group 2 (28)
Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group 1 (48.2 ± 13.5); treatment group 2 (53.9 ± 10.4)
Sex (M/F): treatment group 1(16/14); treatment group 1 (9/19)
Exclusion criteria: secondary membranous nephropathy, such as SLE; malignant tumour; infection, such as hepatitis B or C virus infection, tuberculosis, and syphilis; fasting blood glucose > 6.2 mmol/L; pregnancy or lactating; coexistence of life‐threatening complications, such as heart failure or active gastrointestinal bleeding
|
Interventions |
Treatment group 1
TAC: initial dose of 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg/day divided into two doses at intervals of 12 hours without corticosteroids. The dose was adjusted according to the target trough blood concentration of 5 to 10 ng/mL for the first 6 months and reduced to 4 to 6 ng/mL for the subsequent 3 months. The dose was tapered gradually and discontinued at the end of 12 months. TAC dosage was to be reduced by 30% when a 30% increase in SCr is noted compared with the baseline value, and TAC was withdrawn if the kidney function was not improved after 2 weeks
Treatment group 2
CPA (IV): 0.5 to 0.75 g/m² once in every month for the initial 6 months and once in every 2 to 3 months for the later period. The accumulated dosage was 150 mg/kg
Prednisone (oral): 1 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks and tapered by 5 mg every 2 weeks to 30 mg/day and then reduced by 5 mg every 4 weeks until complete withdrawal at the end of 12 months
Co‐medications
Calcium‐channel blockers (5/58), beta‐receptor blockers (3/58) and diuretics (3/58) were prescribed in those patients who did not meet the target BP (< 125/75 mm Hg)
ACEi and ARB were not initiated during immunosuppressive therapy but were continued in patients who already received ACEi or ARB before recruitment (16/58)
Altiazem was used to elevate the concentration of TAC in blood
Anticoagulant drugs and statins were prescribed to all the patients
|
Outcomes |
Complete remission: defined as a daily proteinuria level < 0.5 g with stable kidney function
Partial remission: defined as proteinuria of 0.5 to 3.5 g/day that was reduced no less than 50% of baseline levels with well‐preserved kidney function
Total remission: defined as either complete or partial remission
No remission: was defined as patients who did not achieve complete or partial remission criteria after 6 months of initial treatment
Relapse: defined as proteinuria >3.5 g/day in two consecutive urinalyses or a persistent severe hypoproteinaemia in patients who had achieved complete or partial remission
Changes in proteinuria
Changes in serum albumin
Changes in eGFR
Side effects
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
High risk |
Not reported how random allocation was performed. Patients were able to switch their randomised intervention group after randomisation based on personal preferences, which some patients did |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Not reported whether more were screened or allocated than were reported in the analysis however outcomes reported comprehensively |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Outcomes of interest reported |
Other bias |
Low risk |
No evidence for other bias; no evidence for financial conflict of interest |