Pahari 1993.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No sufficient detail about concealment of the random allocation sequence before or during enrolment of participants |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 90 patients were randomised, only 71/90 (79%) were finally analysed. The missing outcome data were not balanced in numbers across intervention groups: 6/42 (14%) in CPA group and 13/48 (27%) in prednisolone group |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The study protocol was not available but it was clear that the published reports included all expected outcomes, including those that were pre‐specified |
Other bias | High risk | The inclusion criteria of proteinuria was 2 g/24 hours rather than 3.5 g/24 hours |