Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design; 3‐arm, parallel, open‐label RCT
Study duration; January 2009 to May 2013
Duration of follow‐up: 9 months
|
Participants |
Setting: single centre
Country: China
Inclusion criteria: 18 to 75 years; diagnosis of IMN by renal biopsy and laboratory examination; persistent proteinuria (> 8 g/day) after observation for at least 1 month; nephrotic syndrome; not previously received any immunosuppressive treatment
-
Baseline characteristics
Mean SBP/DBP ± SD (mm Hg): treatment group 1 (122.3 ± 16.1 / 78.5 ± 10.5); treatment group 2 1(23.3 ± 14.0 / 77.7 ± 8.5); treatment group 3 (122.1 ± 12.6 / 80.2 ± 10.4)
Mean proteinuria ± SD (g/24 hours): treatment group 1 (11.7 ± 3.2); treatment group 2 (11.9 ± 1.5); treatment group 3 (12.1 ± 3.7)
Mean serum albumin ± SD (g/L): treatment group 1 (20.5 ± 3.4); treatment group 2 (19.8 ± 3.8); treatment group 3 (21.9 ± 4.9)
Mean eGFR ± SD (mL/min/1.73 m²): treatment group 1 (87.9 ± 16.5); treatment group 2 (97.3 ± 23.0); treatment group 3 (95.8 ± 24.9)
Mean triglyceride ± SD (mmol/L): treatment group 1 (3.3 ± 2.0); treatment group 2 (2.8 ± 1.2); treatment group 3 (2.9 ± 1.2)
Mean SCr ± SD (µmol/L): treatment group 1 (82.4 ± 13.6); treatment group 2 (78.4 ± 13.8); treatment group 3 (78.7 ± 13.8)
Mean serum cholesterol ± SD (mmol/L): treatment group 1 (10.4 ± 3.2); treatment group 2 (10.1 ± 2.6); treatment group 3 (9.8 ± 3.1)
Disease‐course (time since diagnosis) at immunosuppressive Tx initiation: not reported
Pathological stage: (I/II/III/IV): treatment group 1 (10/15/5/0); treatment group 2 (10/13/7/0); treatment group 3 (12/13/5/0)
Hypertension: treatment group 1 (8); treatment group 2 (7); treatment group 3 (5)
Antihypertensive agents were administered to achieve a target BP (systolic < 130 mm Hg and diastolic < 80 mm Hg) were not initiated during follow‐up, but were continued in patients who were already on such treatment prior to recruitment
Number (randomised/analysed): treatment group 1 (30/29); treatment group 2 (20/28); treatment group 3 (30/29)
Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group 1 (43.9 ± 13.2); treatment group 2 (40.8 ± 13.3); treatment group 3 (39.9 ± 14.3)
Sex (M/F): treatment group (17/13); treatment group 2 (16/14); treatment group 3 (14/16)
Exclusion criteria; SCr > 133 mmol/L; active infection; DM; autoimmune disease; tumours; liver function test abnormalities; active peptic ulcer disease
|
Interventions |
Treatment group 1
TAC (oral): 0.05 mg/kg/day divided into two doses at intervals of 12 hours initially. The dose was adjusted to achieve a blood trough concentration of 4 to 8 ng/mL for 6 months and then reduced to 2 to 4 ng/mL in the subsequent 3 months
Corticosteroid (oral): 0.5 mg/kg/day
Treatment group 2
CPA (IV): 750 mg/m² once a month for 6 months, which was then reduced to 750 mg/m² every 3 months
Corticosteroid (oral): 1 mg/kg/day for 2 months, which was reduced by 5 mg/day every 2 weeks to 20 mg/day. At that point, corticosteroid was tapered to zero according to the condition of the patient
Treatment group 3
MMF (oral): 1.5 to 2.0 g/day in 2 doses
Corticosteroid (oral): 1 mg/kg/day for 2 months, which was reduced by 5 mg/day every 2 weeks to 20 mg/day. At that point, corticosteroid was tapered to zero according to the condition of the patient
Duration of treatment
Co‐interventions
Anticoagulant drugs and simvastatin were prescribed to all patients
ACEi/ARB: treatment group 1 (8); treatment group 2 (7); treatment group 3 (5) administered to achieve a target BP (SBP < 130 mm Hg and DBP < 80 mm Hg)
|
Outcomes |
|
Notes |
-
Funding sources:
National Basic Research Program of China
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Doctoral Program of Ministry of Education of China
Special Grade of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science Research Foundation
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
1 lost to follow‐up, 2 died, 1 ceased due to leucopenia |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Data on primary outcome comprehensive, all outcomes reported data. intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed |
Other bias |
Low risk |
No evidence for other sources of bias. no evidence for potential conflict of interest however, no study protocol was published beforehand |