Table 5. Potential reduction in testing resources for different pool sizes.
| Pool Size | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastics | ||||||||||
| 1 mL tips Percent Reduction compared to standard test | 0% | 1% | 13% | 18% | 22% | 24% | 26% | 27% | 28% | 28% |
|
10-200μL tips Percent Reduction compared to standard
test |
0% | 50% | 67% | 75% | 80% | 83% | 86% | 88% | 89% | 90% |
| Total Tips | 0% | 15% | 27% | 34% | 38% | 40% | 42% | 43% | 44% | 45% |
|
Deep well plates Percent Reduction compared to
standard test |
0% | 29% | 48% | 57% | 63% | 67% | 69% | 71% | 73% | 74% |
| PCR Plates Percent Reduction compared to standard test | 0% | 50% | 67% | 75% | 80% | 83% | 86% | 88% | 89% | 90% |
| Total Plates | 0% | 31% | 50% | 59% | 65% | 69% | 71% | 73% | 75% | 76% |
| Reagents | ||||||||||
| Extraction Percent Reduction compared to standard test | 0% | 50% | 67% | 75% | 80% | 83% | 86% | 88% | 89% | 90% |
|
qPCR reagents Percent Reducation compared to
standard test |
0% | 50% | 67% | 75% | 80% | 83% | 86% | 88% | 89% | 90% |