TABLE II.
Comparative performances of different methods in terms of seen recall , unseen recall and harmonic mean of seen and unseen recall for combination 1 of seen and unseen classes from TABLE I. Bold fonts indicate the best values in each column.
Methods | NIH | NIH-900 | Open-i | PMC | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
ESZSL(X) | 38.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 38.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 29.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
ESZSL(CT) | 24.23 | 1.42 | 2.68 | 32.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 45.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 30.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
DeVise(X) | 0.00 | 34.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 22.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 21.21 | 0.00 | |||
DeVise(CT) | 5.49 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 14.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 21.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
SAE(X) | 29.57 | 8.00 | 12.59 | 30.67 | 9.13 | 14.08 | 34.25 | 10.39 | 15.94 | 11.43 | 9.09 | 10.13 | |||
SAE(CT) | 29.17 | 8.63 | 13.32 | 29.67 | 9.62 | 14.52 | 29.45 | 11.43 | 16.47 | 11.43 | 12.12 | 11.76 | |||
GMN(X) | 32.88 | 6.07 | 10.24 | 33.08 | 3.51 | 6.34 | 37.33 | 5.48 | 9.56 | 17.07 | 11.76 | 13.93 | |||
GMN(CT) | 35.07 | 5.33 | 9.25 | 26.26 | 1.56 | 2.94 | 30.48 | 1.60 | 3.04 | 12.20 | 2.94 | 4.74 | |||
GDAN(X) | 34.94 | 7.27 | 12.04 | 27.78 | 8.97 | 13.56 | 35.27 | 5.94 | 10.16 | 26.93 | 2.94 | 5.30 | |||
GDAN(CT) | 32.14 | 8.95 | 14.00 | 29.80 | 6.24 | 10.32 | 31.51 | 4.57 | 7.98 | 31.71 | 5.88 | 9.92 | |||
Proposed | 30.12 | 19.67 | 23.80 | 40.72 | 45.40 | 42.93 | 37.74 | 41.13 | 39.36 | 25.71 | 30.30 | 27.82 |