Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;5(3):txab091. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab091

Table 1.

Composition and nutritional profile of the diets offered during the experimental period1,2

Item, % dry matter (DM) ADAP-1 ADAP-2 FIN
Sugarcane bagasse 25.0 20.0 8.5
Ground corn 37.8 42.8 54.3
Corn gluten feed 20.0 20.0 20.0
Whole cottonseed 15.0 15.0 15.0
Urea 0.2 0.2 0.2
Mineral-vitamin mix3 2.0 2.0 2.0
Nutritional profile
 DM 69.1 72.5 81.8
 Crude protein, % DM 13.0 13.2 13.8
 Ether extract, % DM 5.3 5.4 5.8
 Neutral detergent fiber, % DM 36.8 33.5 25.9
 Starch 31.2 34.7 42.9
 Total digestible nutrients, % DM4 74.5 76.7 81.5
 Metabolizable energy, Mcal/kg5 2.69 2.77 2.94
 Net energy for maintenance, Mcal/kg5 1.79 1.86 2.03
 Net energy for gain, Mcal/kg5 1.15 1.21 1.36

1Experimental period lasted 119 d.

2ADAP-1: adaptation diet (step-up 1) offered for 7 d to CONT and MEG-14 and for 3 d to MEG-6; ADAP-2: adaptation diet (step-up 2) offered for 7 d to CONT and MEG-14 and for 3 d to MEG-6. FIN: finishing diet offered for all animals following or not an adaptation diet.

3Mineral-vintamin mix (MCassab Comércio e Indústria; São Paulo, SP, Brazil) contained 21.0% Ca, 2.0% Mg, 15.0% Na, 23.1% Cl, 750 ppm Cu, 2,000 ppm Mn, 3,000 ppm Zn, 16.7 ppm Co, 30 ppm I, 5 ppm Se, 115 IU Vitamin A, 14 IU Vitamin D3, 180 IU Vitamin E, and 1,500 ppm sodium monensin (Rumensin; Elanco Animal Health, São Paulo, SP, Brazil).

4Calculated according to Weiss et al. (1992) and chemical composition of ingredients.

5Estimated with the equations proposed by NRC (1996; Level 1) with the addition of ionophore (sodium monensin) and using the TDN values, which had been calculated with equation proposed by Weiss et al. (1992).