Table 3.
Eluate 1 vs. Eluate 2 (Run A vs. Run B) |
100 beads vs. 50 beads (Run B vs. Run C) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antigen | Mean difference | 95% LOA | ICC | Mean difference | 95% LOA | ICC |
pgp3 | −204.3 | (–3,405.3, 2,996.7) | 0.990 | 167.5 | (–2,009.9, 2,344.9) | 0.995 |
CT694 | −339.8 | (–2,896.3, 2,216.6) | 0.979 | 44.0 | (–1,043.3, 1,131.2) | 0.996 |
CTB | −124.3 | (–1,322.7, 1,074.0) | 0.968 | 20.2 | (–445.8, 486.3) | 0.995 |
ETEC LTB | −225.2 | (–1,613.2, 1,162.8) | 0.972 | 34.1 | (–513.8, 582.0) | 0.995 |
Cp17 | −643.6 | (–4,521.6, 3,234.5) | 0.981 | 320.2 | (–2,246.6, 2,886.9) | 0.992 |
Cp23 | −690.6 | (–4,691.2, 3,309.9) | 0.970 | 324.1 | (–1,845.4, 2,493.6) | 0.991 |
LecA | −134.1 | (–1,124.0, 855.8) | 0.977 | 9.9 | (–393.0, 412.8) | 0.996 |
p18 | −177.3 | (–1,460.2, 1,105.7) | 0.978 | 9.9 | (–526.3, 546.0) | 0.996 |
p39 | −434.0 | (–3,840.9, 2,973.0) | 0.958 | 220.4 | (–1,612.0, 2,052.9) | 0.987 |
Sal B | −101.0 | (–1,700.4, 1,498.3) | 0.850 | 40.8 | (–584.6, 666.2) | 0.967 |
Sal D | −36.8 | (–850.0, 776.3) | 0.907 | 9.0 | (–242.2, 260.3) | 0.988 |
VSP3 | −252.5 | (–2,153.2, 1,648.2) | 0.981 | 82.2 | (–1,002.4, 1,166.7) | 0.994 |
VSP5 | −274.7 | (–2,241.5, 1,692.1) | 0.983 | 101.5 | (–1,083.1, 1,286.1) | 0.994 |
ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; LOA = limits of agreement. Values represent pairwise comparisons of raw median fluorescence intensity minus background values from 392 children. Eluate 1 was taken from the first blood spot extension and eluate 2 from the second blood spot extension. The bead comparison (e.g., 50 vs. 100) refers to the number of bead reads per well used by the software algorithm.