Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;61(11):652–660. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0124

Table 1. Index for patient-based analysis of five neurosurgery specialists, five nonspecialists, and AI.

Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 6 Rater 7 Rater 8 Rater 9 Rater 10 AI
TP 135 135 135 132 134 130 130 132 131 131 133
FP 11 12 6 0 5 5 2 2 0 10 15
FN 0 0 0 3 1 5 5 3 4 4 2
TN 185 184 190 196 191 191 194 194 196 186 181
Sensitivity 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.99
Specificity 0.94 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.92
Accuracy 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.96 0.95
Precision 0.92 0.92 0.96 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.93 0.90
F 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.95 0.94
MCC 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.91 0.90

Raters 1 to 5 are neurosurgery specialists and Raters 6 to 10 are nonspecialists.

AI: artificial intelligence, F: F-measure, FN: false negative, FP: false positive, MCC: Matthews correlation coefficient, TN: true negative, TP: true positive.