Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 16;15:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100418

Table 2.

Functional connectivity within the SN, and among the three examined networks: Negative correlations with NA (T2) scoresa.

Functional network connectivity t-values p-valuesb Connectivity value (Z-scores)c
(a) Within SN
SN.ACC−SN.SMG (R) −3.92 0.0016 0.34 (±0.25)
SN.Amyg (R)−SN.rPFC (L) −3.59 0.0030 −0.01 (±0.21)
SN.SMG (R)−SN.rPFC (L) −3.05 0.0095 0.36 (±0.27)
SN.Amyg (R)−SN.ACC −3.10 0.0108 0.08 (±0.22)
SN.AI (L)−SN.SMG (R) −2.90 0.0369 0.38 (±0.28)
SN.Amyg (R)−SN.rPFC (R) −3.01 0.0110 −0.03 (±0.21)
SN.ACC−SN.SMG (L) −2.90 0.0208 0.33 (±0.26)
SN.Amyg (L)−SN.AI (R) −2.90 0.0410 0.21 (±0.22)
SN.Amyg (R)−SN.AI (R) −2.67 0.0210 0.20 (±0.23)
SN.Amyg (L)−SN.ACC −2.66 0.0410 0.10 (±0.22)
SN.Amyg (L)−SN.rPFC (R) −2.58 0.0410 −0.03 (±0.21)
(b) Between SN and FPN
SN.Amyg (R)−FPN.dlPFC (R) −3.91 0.0017 0.03 (±0.20)
SN.SMG (R)−FPN.PPC (L) −2.92 0.0103 0.08 (±0.26)
SN.AI (L)−FPN.dlPFC (R) −2.85 0.0369 0.21 (±0.26)
SN.Amyg (L)−FPN.dlPFC (R) −2.69 0.0392 0.02 (±0.20)
SN.AI (R)−FPN.dlPFC (L) −2.64 0.0456 0.21 (±0.25)
SN.AI (L)−FPN.PPC (L) −2.66 0.0427 0.30 (±0.24)
SN.Amyg (R)−FPN.PPC (L) −2.72 0.0210 0.01 (±0.20)
SN.Amyg (R)−FPN.dlPFC (L) −2.51 0.0248 0.05 (±0.21)
(c) Between SN and DMN
SN.SMG (R)−DMN.lPC (L) −3.26 0.0094 −0.01 (±0.29)
SN.SMG (R)−DMN.lPC (R) −3.11 0.0095 0.03 (±0.31)
SN.SMG (L)−DMN.lPC (R) −2.79 0.0435 0.12 (±0.29)
SN.SMG (R)−DMN.mPFC −2.62 0.0205 −0.17 (±0.29)
SN.Amyg (R)−DMN.PCC −2.54 0.0248 0.19 (±0.19)
(d) Between DMN and FPN
FPN.PPC (L)−DMN.PCC −2.83 0.0320 0.23 (±0.22)

Abbreviations: NA = negative affect; SN = salience network; DMN = default mode network; FPN = frontoparietal network; Amyg = amygdala; rPFC = rostral prefrontal cortex; dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; AI = anterior insula cortex; SMG = supramarginal gyrus; dlPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; PPC = posterior parietal cortex; mPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; lPC = lateral parietal cortex.

a

Table 2 only shows the significant results (N = 496).

b

False discovery rate (FDR) seed-level corrected p < 0.05, two-sided.

c

Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD).