Table 6.
Summary of the results.
| Findings | |
|---|---|
| Behavioural | Percentage of impulsive choices changed from 61.43 when an immediate reward was present (immediacy present) to 28.49 when both rewards were delayed (immediacy absent) |
| ERP | Larger P2, LPP and smaller N2 in response to immediacy |
| Source Analysis | Increased activation of lingual, fusiform, superior temporal, and postcentral gyri during P2 in response to immediacy |
| Increased activation of lingual gyrus and decreased activation of middle temporal gyrus during N2 in response to immediacy | |
| Increased activation of lingual and fusiform gyri and cuneus during LPP in response to immediacy | |
| Correlational | During P2, differential activation of insula between the immediacy conditions predicted individual differences in degree of preference reversal |