Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;9(2):471–488. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00150-8

Table 5.

Fine and Gray competing risk model for time to pneumonitis while on treatment by LOTa

Parameter During LOT 1 During LOT 2 During LOT 3
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Demographic characteristics
 Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) 0.95 (0.86–1.05) 0.3388 1.08 (0.93–1.25) 0.3079 0.98 (0.79–1.21) 0.8634
 Gender (male vs. female) 1.15 (1.04–1.27) 0.0051* 1.2 (1.04–1.39) 0.0143* 1.02 (0.81–1.27) 0.8916
 Race (African American vs. Caucasian) 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 0.4602 1.01 (0.79–1.28) 0.9534 1.12 (0.8–1.58) 0.5115
 Race (Asian vs. Caucasian) 1.26 (0.88–1.81) 0.2114 0.85 (0.48–1.53) 0.5931 0.98 (0.49–1.96) 0.9498
 Race (other/unknown vs. Caucasian) 1.11 (0.87–1.41) 0.4031 0.92 (0.61–1.38) 0.6853 1.09 (0.56–2.12) 0.8042
Histology
 Squamous vs. non-squamousb 1.32 (1.18–1.47)  <0 .0001* 1.16 (0.98–1.38) 0.0901 1.28 (0.98–1.67) 0.0694
 Unknown vs. non-squamous 0.85 (0.66–1.09) 0.1951 1.33 (0.94–1.9) 0.1093 0.93 (0.42–2.03) 0.8538
Biomarker status
 EGFRc (positive vs. negative) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) 0.0273* 0.78 (0.62–0.99) 0.0370* 0.86 (0.63–1.16) 0.3085
 EGFR (unknown vs. negative) 0.82 (0.71–0.95) 0.0072* 0.83 (0.68–1.01) 0.0645 0.84 (0.62–1.12) 0.2315
 PD-L1 (positive vs. negative) 1.16 (0.8–1.69) 0.4410 0.89 (0.56–1.39) 0.5984 0.71 (0.34–1.47) 0.3538
 PD-L1 (unknown vs. negative) 0.82 (0.58–1.16) 0.2643 0.69 (0.46–1.03) 0.0698 0.61 (0.32–1.17) 0.1383
History of adverse events
 CCI score (1–4 vs. 0) 0.98 (0.89–1.09) 0.7420 0.89 (0.77–1.03) 0.1046 1.02 (0.82–1.27) 0.8500
 History of diabetes (yes vs. no) 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 0.7113 1.01 (0.86–1.19) 0.9171 0.98 (0.76–1.25) 0.8445
 History of pneumonitis (yes vs. no) 2.91 (2.6–3.25)  <0 .0001* 2.9 (2.51–3.36)  < 0.0001* 2.91 (2.35–3.6)  <0 .0001*
Treatment category
 Any ICI monotherapy (yes vs. no) 1.64 (0.89–3.02) 0.1104 1.92 (1.04–3.56) 0.0375* 1.45 (0.68–3.09) 0.3302
 Any ICI combination therapy (yes vs. no) 1.06 (0.78–1.44) 0.6984 1.58 (1.04–2.4) 0.0305* 1.5 (0.77–2.95) 0.2370
 EGFR TKI therapy (yes vs. no) 0.95 (0.52–1.76) 0.8729 0.94 (0.49–1.79) 0.8443 1.04 (0.49–2.22) 0.9149
 Other targeted therapy (yes vs. no) 0.55 (0.43–0.71)  < .0001* 0.58 (0.41–0.83) 0.0027* 0.73 (0.45–1.21) 0.2247
 Any platinum-based chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 0.92 (0.52–1.66) 0.7909 0.98 (0.53–1.79) 0.9395 0.76 (0.36–1.63) 0.4856
 Any non-platinum-based chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 0.9 (0.49–1.65) 0.7342 1.12 (0.62–2.05) 0.7069 0.73 (0.36–1.51) 0.3957
Radiation therapy
 History of radiation therapy (yes vs. no) 1.33 (1.19–1.49)  <0 .0001* 1.14 (0.95–1.38) 0.1647 1.46 (1.07–2) 0.0181*

CCI Charlson Comorbidity Index; EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor; ICI immune checkpoint inhibitor; LOT line of therapy; PD-L1 programmed death-ligand 1; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor

aRegimens whose start dates were on or after January 1, 2008, were considered for the analysis. Assessment period is from start of LOT to 30 days after end of current LOT or day prior to start of next LOT, whichever is earlier, or (where no next LOT) up to end of follow-up for patient or end of LOT + 30, whichever is earlier. Shaded cells represent parameters that were significant at the 0.05 level

bPatients with squamous cell carcinoma were compared against patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma only. Non-squamous NSCLC includes adenocarcinoma and large cell lung cancer. Patients with unknown histology were excluded from this analysis