-
•
In an ideal situation, patients should be followed up within 3 months where possible during the initiation phase of treatment
-
•
Consider increasing the frequency of follow-up when there are safety or tolerability concerns, adherence issues, the patient is particularly anxious or distressed if there is a high risk of sequelae, severe acne, or a lack of efficacy (with current or previous treatments)
-
•
Consider decreasing the frequency of follow-up when the treatment is well tolerated, the patient is stable, there is lack of evidence of sequelae development, adherence is good, or for reasons where the patient cannot return for appointments easily (such as going away to college)
-
•
Consider the period over which a prescribed treatment is expected to have an effect
Review, assess, modify
-
•
Switching treatment -
○
Consider when there is a lack of response ∗ (13/13), the patient is unsatisfied or unhappy with the response ∗ (10/13), adverse effects or issues with tolerability occur ∗ (12/13), or the patient desires to switch treatment ∗ (11/13)
-
•
Escalating treatment -
○
Consider when there is an inadequate response ∗ (13/13) or the patient is unhappy or unsatisfied with the response ∗ (12/13)
-
•
De-escalating treatment -
○
Consider when there are adverse effects/issues with tolerability ∗ (10/13) or a patient desire to de-escalate treatment ∗ (10/13)
-
•
Stopping treatment -
○
Consider when treatment goals that were set together with the patient have been met ∗ (11/13), satisfactory efficacy outcomes have been achieved ∗ (10/13), adverse effects or issues with tolerability occur ∗ (10/13), or the patient desires to stop treatment ∗ (11/13)
|