Table 3.
Description of co-citation clusters.a
| Mean yearb | Cluster ID | Sizec | Silhouette | Label (LLRd) |
| 2003 | 15 | 10 | 0.984 | User groups perspective |
| 2005 | 3 | 69 | 0.805 | Clinical decision support |
| 2005 | 5 | 62 | 0.815 | Information technology diffusion |
| 2005 | 10 | 31 | 0.777 | Clinical documentation |
| 2006 | 1 | 72 | 0.872 | Integrative review |
| 2006 | 13 | 18 | 0.947 | Medication reconciliation issue |
| 2007 | 4 | 64 | 0.838 | Quality requirement |
| 2007 | 6 | 61 | 0.809 | Contingency factor |
| 2010 | 2 | 70 | 0.804 | EHRe systems |
| 2010 | 7 | 61 | 0.847 | Clinical decision support system |
| 2010 | 12 | 30 | 0.833 | Electronic health information exchange |
| 2011 | 0 | 95 | 0.849 | Genomic era |
| 2011 | 11 | 31 | 0.936 | Frequency |
| 2013 | 8 | 51 | 0.893 | Developing knowledge resource |
| 2013 | 9 | 43 | 0.950 | Allocating scarce resource |
aThe connected components in cluster 14 are less than the default value (K=25), so CiteSpace did not report 14 [39].
bThe average year of the articles in a cluster.
cThe number of articles in each cluster.
dLLR: log-likelihood ratio.
eEHR: electronic health record.