Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020 Dec;33:17976–17986.

Table 1:

Value function of the fitted ITRs with respect to the latent disorder severity (sum of Z1; the lower, the better) and the predictive symptoms (sum of Y˜; the lower, the better) on the independent test set, mean (standard deviation), from 100 simulations under different training sample size N

N Proposed CausalForest TARNet Deep-O Deep-Q Deep-A
Value function for latent disorder severity (sum of Z1; the lower, the better)
200 Mean (sd) 1.80 (0.04) 1.85 (0.06) 1.93 (0.05) 1.85 (0.04) 1.83 (0.04) 2.00 (0.08)
500 Mean (sd) 1.77 (0.02) 1.80 (0.03) 1.91 (0.07) 1.80 (0.02) 1.80 (0.02) 1.98 (0.06)
1000 Mean (sd) 1.76 (0.01) 1.79 (0.02) 1.88 (0.09) 1.79 (0.01) 1.79 (0.01) 1.98 (0.04)
2000 Mean (sd) 1.74 (0.01) 1.79 (0.01) 1.87 (0.09) 1.79 (0.01) 1.79 (0.01) 1.98 (0.04)
Value function for predictive symptoms (sum of Y˜; the lower, the better)
200 Mean (sd) 12.74 (0.19) 12.91 (0.28) 13.30 (0.22) 12.92 (0.19) 12.84 (0.17) 13.62 (0.32)
500 Mean (sd) 12.59 (0.10) 12.70 (0.10) 13.22 (0.33) 12.72 (0.09) 12.71 (0.10) 13.53 (0.24)
1000 Mean (sd) 12.57 (0.09) 12.65 (0.06) 13.06 (0.40) 12.65 (0.06) 12.67 (0.06) 13.55 (0.17)
2000 Mean (sd) 12.52 (0.05) 12.62 (0.04) 13.01 (0.41) 12.64 (0.06) 12.67 (0.06) 13.54 (0.17)