Table 2.
The classification performance (in percentage) of four machine learning methods on GM.
| GM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RetainedFeas | OptimalFeas | Sen | Spec | Acc | AUC | |
| SPEC | 9,396 | 8,045 | 86.93 ± 2.41 | 91.36 ± 2.94 | 88.61 ± 1.86 | 89.15 ± 2.53 |
| ReliefF | 9,396 | 7,809 | 87.29 ± 3.54 | 92.24± 3.69 | 89.58 ± 2.39 | 89.77 ± 3.58 |
| RFE | 5,285 | 2,841 | 92.42 ± 2.62 | 85.85 ± 2.46 | 88.56 ± 1.99 | 89.14 ± 2.55 |
| STABLASSO | 3,547 | 2368 | 90.41 ± 3.21 | 79.55 ± 2.39 | 84.98 ± 1.99 | 84.98 ± 2.98 |
RetainedFeas, The number of features retained by different feature selection methods; OptimalFeas, the optimal feature subsets selected from retained features; Sen, sensitivity; Spec, specificity; Acc, accuracy; AUC, The area under ROC curve. The best performance for each indicator is shown in bold.