Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr 9;89(6):1075–1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001

TABLE 8.

Procedural features of randomized trials comparing ES-LBD versus ES

First
Author
Year Stone size
(mm)
Maximum balloon
size (mm)
Extent of sphincter
incision (%)
Procedure
cost: ES-LBD
Procedure
cost: ES
Procedure duration:
ES-LBD (min)
Procedure
duration: ES (min)
Heo60 2007 10-40 20 50
Kim62 2009 >15 18 50 18+12 19+13
Stefanidis70 2011 12-20 20 100
Teoh8 2013 Subset >13 15 33-50 24.3+12.9* 27.2+16.9*
Jun Bo65 2013 >15 20 33 14.5+8.4 15.9+8.8
Li59 2014 Subset >12 18 33 38.6+15.5 47.1+20.2
Guo136 2015 >10 15 33-66 20+11 20+10
Chu58 2017 >10 20 33 18,021 (18,021-22,541) 13,199 (13,199-17,719)
Karsenti57 2017 >13 20 100 447 euros 447 euros 449 euros 709 euros 30 (22-48) 30 (22-48) 35 (25-50) 45

ES-LBD, Endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation; —, data not available.

*

Procedure durations are for entire published cohort, which includes smaller stones.

Procedure duration and cost when mechanical lithotripsy is used.