Table 3. Themes within the TFA construct representing prospective acceptability of oral PrEP and vaginal ring during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Key themes | Affective attitude | Burden | Ethicality | Opportunity costs | Perceived effectiveness | Self- efficacy | Intervention coherence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
representing each TFA construct | How an individual feel about the intervention | The perceived amount of effort that is required to participate in the intervention | The extent to which the intervention has a good fit with an individual’s value system | The extent to which benefits profits, or values must be given up to engage in the intervention | The extent to which the intervention is perceived to be likely to achieve its aim | The participants confidence that they can perform the behaviour(s) required to participate in the intervention | The extent to which participant understands the intervention and how it works |
Oral pills | (+) Familiarity of taking oral pills | (-) Difficulties to take the daily dose of the pill | (-) Cultural norms discourage pregnant women to take medications | (+/-) Mixed perceptions whether taking the pills will interfere in women’s daily lives (e.g. Pills may cause vomiting, dizziness). | (+) The pills will protect mother and baby during pregnancy and breastfeeding from getting HIV | (-) Concerns in ability to take the pills due to size | (-) Taking pills is unsafe for the baby or the pregnancy |
(-) Dislike the size of pills | (-) Experiencing potential side effects will be burdensome | (+/-) Pills may work for some women and not others | (-) Lack of confidence in remembering to take pills daily | (-) Taking pills during breastfeeding may dry out production of milk | |||
(-) Questions about taking the pills | |||||||
vaginal ring | (+) Discreetness of the ring once inserted | (+) Ease of setting the vaginal ring and forgetting about it for a month | (-) It’s taboo to insert things in the vaginal whilst pregnant | (+/-) Using the ring may or may not interfere with women’s’ daily lives (e.g. use may cause mental discomfort) | (+/-) Uncertainties about the effectiveness of the ring | (+) Confidence in using the ring because of its discreetness | (-) Concerns about hygiene when using the ring |
(-) Dislike the size and look of the ring | (-) Effectiveness linked to correct placement | (-) Lack of confidence in inserting and removing the ring | (-) Concerns about long term health effects of inserting a ring | ||||
(-) fate of ring at time of delivery and harm to the baby | |||||||
(-) Questions about length of using the ring and protection the ring provides | |||||||
Both PrEP methods | (+) Women should have the choice to decide what PrEP methods to use | (+) Clear understanding of routes of protection for both PrEP methods | |||||
(+) Endorsement from healthcare professionals on taking both PrEP methods is key | (+/-) Mixed understanding about duration of using both PrEP methods | ||||||
Suggested strategy to enhance acceptability | General education | Involvement of local communities & HCPs | General education | Practice and skills building General education | |||
• Testimonials from pregnant or breastfeeding moms | • Involve trusted sources in the intervention roll out, & implementation. | • Supplement with evidence from PMTCT studies, ongoing trials (when available) | • Provide strategies to enhance self-efficacy e.g. reminders to take pills; teach women how to insert and remove the ring (prior to dispensation) | ||||
• Describe side effects of PrEP options | • Educate HCPs to ensure support and endorsement | • Explain mechanism of action | |||||
• Differentiate traditional vaginal practices and ring use | • Educate about vaginal hygiene and PrEP products |
Notes: * (+) indicate a positive reflection of the TFA construct (e.g. Affective attitude- familiarity of taking pills). (-) indicate a negative reflection of the TFA construct (e.g. Burden–experiencing potential side effects will be burdensome).
(+/-) indicate both a positive and negative reflection of the TFA construct (e.g. Opportunity costs- Using the ring may or may not interfere with women’s’ other life priorities).
Acronyms: HCP = health care provider, ARV = antiretroviral medications, PEP = post exposure prophylaxis, PrEP = pre-exposure prophylaxis, TFA = Theoretical framework of acceptability.