Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Cancer. 2021 Jul 29;2(9):891–903. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00234-4

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Spatial relationships among the cell types are distinct with respect to response. a, Representative Voronoi tessellations of three cores for each response group (each core is from a unique patient; representative of n=6 patients). b, Heatmap displaying top neighboring cell types (columns) for each given index cell type (rows). The difference between responder and non-responder cells in their absolute number of top two neighboring cell types are indicated by color (red, more in responders; blue, more in non-responders). Cell type clusters are annotated by color along the rows and columns Color legends apply to panels A and C (data representative of n=12 patients total). c, Minimum spanning tree representations of spatial relationships among the cell types in the non-responder (n=37196 cells) and responder (n=22257 cells) groups based on minimum Euclidean distances from each cell to all other cell types. Abbreviations: Apop, apoptotic; DP, double-positive; Hep, Hepatocellular carcinoma; Imm, immune subtype; Lym, lymphocyte; Mac, macrophage; Neut, neutrophil; NR, non-responder; R, responder; Tc, cytotoxic T; Th, helper T; UA, unassigned.