Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 16;2021(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2

Saito 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, comparative, interventional, parallel, phase 3 trial with 2 arms
  • comparison of aprepitant 125/80 mg + palonosetron + dexamethasone vs aprepitant 125/80 mg + granisetron + dexamethasone


Recruitment period: 2012 to 2015
  • 491 patients enrolled


Masking: double‐blind
Baseline patient characteristics: n.r.
Follow‐up: n.r.
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • ≥ 20 years old and ≤ 75 years old (at the time informed consent was obtained)

  • female

  • primary breast cancer stages I to III and scheduled to receive AC therapy

  • ECOG performance status 0 to 1

  • Can correctly fill in a symptom diary

  • meet the following standard values in general clinical tests: white blood cells ≥ 3000/mm³, neutrophils ≥ 1500/mm³, blood platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³, AST (GOT) and ALT (GPT) ≤ 2.5 times high end of normal range at the facility, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times high end of normal range at the facility, creatinine ≤ 1.5 times high end of normal range at the facility

  • normal cardiac function: ECG within normal range; no symptoms; no abnormality requiring treatment; cardiac function determined to be normal by Interview, echocardiography, chest X‐ray, BNP, etc.


Exclusion criteria
  • history of administration of moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy

  • receiving an antiemetic drug (5‐HT₃ receptor antagonist, phenothiazine, butyrophenone, benzamide, dopamine receptor antagonist)

  • received a benzodiazepine or a narcotic formulation within 48 h before commencement of AC therapy

  • received systemic corticosteroid therapy within 72 h before commencement of AC therapy

  • history of gastrointestinal tract surgery (excluding appendectomy)

  • received or scheduled to receive radiation therapy for abdominal region (diaphragm or lower) or pelvis for a period from 6 days before commencement of AC therapy until Day 6 of AC therapy

  • had vomiting or dry vomiting within 24 h before commencement of AC therapy

  • active multiple cancer (synchronous multiple cancer or metachronous multiple cancer with disease‐free interval ≤ 5 years)

  • symptomatic cerebral tumour (including a benign tumour)

  • received the following drugs within 7 days before commencement of AC therapy: clarithromycin, erythromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and digoxin

  • received the following drugs within 4 weeks before commencement of AC therapy: barbiturate drug, rifampicin, phenytoin, and carbamazepine

  • pregnant or lactating patients, patients who may be pregnant, patients hoping to become pregnant during the study period, and patients taking an oral contraceptive

  • with coexisting disease, such as systemic infection, hepatitis, and uncontrollable diabetes, for whom dexamethasone sodium phosphate cannot be administered

  • history of hypersensitivity to granisetron, palonosetron, aprepitant, or dexamethasone

  • judged by investigator to be inappropriate for inclusion in the study


Mean/median age (range), years: n.r.
Gender: female
Tumour/cancer type: breast cancer
Chemotherapy regimen: anthracycline and cyclophosphamide‐containing regimens (AC)
Country: Japan (11 institutions)
Interventions Experimental: arm A: palonosetron
Day 1: aprepitant (125 mg) + palonosetron (0.75 mg) + dexamethasone (9.9 mg)
Days 2 to 3: aprepitant (80 mg)
Experimental: arm B: granisetron
Day 1: aprepitant (125 mg) + granisetron (40 μg/kg) + dexamethasone (9.9 mg)
Days 2 to 3: aprepitant (80 mg)
Outcomes Primary outcome
  • proportion of patients who showed complete response (no vomiting and no salvage treatment) during a period from 24 to 120 hours after AC therapy


Secondary outcomes
  • proportion of patients who showed complete response (no vomiting and no salvage treatment) from 0 to 24 hours of AC therapy

  • proportion of patients who showed complete response (no vomiting and no salvage treatment) from 0 to 120 hours of AC therapy

  • proportion of patients who showed no nausea/degree of nausea

  • quality of life

  • dietary intake

  • adverse events

Notes
  • registration ID: UMIN000007882

  • funding source: non‐profit organisation: Japan Clinical Research Support Unit

  • conference abstract, results are still unpublished

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomised trial but method of randomisation not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of participants Low risk Quote: "... double‐blind ..."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of personnel Low risk Quote: "... double‐blind ..."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes (Patient reported outcomes) Low risk Comment: both patients and personnel were blinded towards the intervention and thus had no influence on outcome assessment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Subjective outcomes (Patient reported outcomes) Low risk Comment: all patients were included for patient‐reported outcomes analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: only complete response and quality of life were reported in the results section
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: conference abstract, not evaluable