Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 16;2021(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2

Tanioka 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 study with 2 arms
  • comparison of aprepitant + granisetron + dexamethasone vs placebo + granisetron + dexamethasone


Study period: January 2011 to September 2012
  • 94 patients enrolled and randomised


Masking: double‐blind
Baseline patient characteristics: reported
Follow‐up: n.r.
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • women aged 20 to 69 years with histologically confirmed malignancy who were naïve to aprepitant and scheduled to receive carboplatin‐ or irinotecan‐based regimens

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 0 to 2

  • estimated life expectancy ≥ 3 months

  • had to meet the following laboratory criteria: neutrophil count ≥ 1500 mm‐3; platelet count ≥ 100,000 mm‐3; aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 2.5 times ULN at the facility; total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN at the facility; creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN at the facility


Exclusion criteria
  • history of alcohol consumption, defined as ≥ 1 alcoholic drinks per week

  • at risk of vomiting for other reasons (symptomatic brain metastasis, meningeal infiltration, epilepsy, active peptic ulcer, gastrointestinal obstruction, concomitant abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy)

  • pregnant, nursing, or possibly pregnant women


Median age, years: 53 (36 to 67) in aprepitant group, 59 (33 to 69) in placebo group
Gender: female
Tumour/cancer type: ovarian cancer (early/advanced), endometrial cancer, other, ascites or peritoneal dissemination
Chemotherapy regimen: carboplatin + intravenous cytotoxic anti‐tumour drugs such as paclitaxel and pemetrexed; carboplatin + paclitaxel; carboplatin + liposomal doxorubicin; irinotecan + fluorouracil, bevacizumab, or cetuximab
Country: Japan (multi‐centre)
Interventions Experimental: arm A: aprepitant
Day 1: aprepitant 125 mg p.o. + granisetron 1 mg i.v. + dexamethasone 12 mg i.v.
Days 2 to 3: aprepitant 80 mg p.o. + dexamethasone 4 mg i.v.
Experimental: arm B: placebo
Day 1: placebo 0 mg p.o. + granisetron 1 mg i.v. + dexamethasone 20 mg i.v.
Days 2 to 3: placebo 0 mg p.o. + dexamethasone 8 mg i.v.
Outcomes Primary endpoint
  • rate of complete response for 120 h from start of first cycle of MEC, in acute (0 to 24 h), delayed (24 to 120 h), and overall (0 to 120 h) phases


Secondary endpoint(s)
  • no emesis

  • no rescue therapy

  • no significant nausea

  • no nausea

  • total control (no emesis, no rescue therapy, and no nausea)

Notes
  • this study has been registered in the University Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as No. 000004998

  • "the study protocol was funded by the Hanshin Oncology Study Group"

  • conflicts of interest: "HM reported having accepted an unrestricted research grant and received honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no conflict of interest"

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "... randomly assigned to the aprepitant group or placebo group according to a computer‐generated, blinded allocation schedule"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: precise allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of participants Low risk Quote: "... double‐blind ..."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of personnel Low risk Quote: "... double‐blind ..."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes (Patient reported outcomes) Low risk Comment: both patients and personnel were blinded towards the intervention and thus had no influence on outcome assessment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes (including mortality and safety) Low risk Comment: both patients and personnel were blinded towards the intervention and thus had no influence on outcome assessment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Subjective outcomes (Patient reported outcomes) Low risk Quote: "of these, 91 patients were included in the full analysis set"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Objective outcomes (including mortality and safety data) Low risk Quote: "safety was evaluated in all the 92 subjects who were assigned to treatment, including the patient who discontinued chemotherapy due to a hypersensitivity reaction"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcome measures were reported in the results section
Other bias Low risk Comment: no information to suggest other sources of bias