Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;12:742184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742184

TABLE 2.

Summary of regression analyses predicting executive function performance.

R 2 ΔR2 ΔF R 2 ΔR2 ΔF

Global switching cost Interference cost
Model 1 0.014 0.014 0.401 Model 1 0.079 0.079 2.456
Model 2 (GXT) 0.129 0.115 7.425* Model 2 (GXT) 0.170 0.091 6.108*
Model 1 0.014 0.014 0.401 Model 1 0.079 0.079 2.456
Model 2 (ROCK) 0.164 0.150 10.048* Model 2 (ROCK) 0.158 0.079 5.240*
Model 1 0.014 0.014 0.401 Model 1 0.079 0.079 2.456
Model 2 (EQUA) 0.040 0.026 1.500 Model 2 (EQUA) 0.179 0.100 6.822*

Local switching cost Updating cost

Model 1 0.001 0.001 0.033 Model 1 0.015 0.015 0.434
Model 2 (GXT) 0.002 0.000 0.022 Model 2 (GXT) 0.019 0.004 0.197
Model 1 0.001 0.001 0.033 Model 1 0.015 0.015 0.434
Model 2 (ROCK) 0.020 0.019 1.079 Model 2 (ROCK) 0.025 0.010 0.548
Model 1 0.001 0.001 0.033 Model 1 0.015 0.015 0.434
Model 2 (EQUA) 0.003 0.001 0.084 Model 2 (EQUA) 0.032 0.016 0.930

Model 1, Age and education; Model 2, Age and education and cardiorespiratory fitness estimate.

*p < 0.05.

GXT, Maximal graded exercise test; EQUA, Non-exercise prediction equation; ROCK, Rockport Fitness Walking Test.