Table 2.
Results of multiple logistic regressions with problems in EQ-5D dimensions used as dependent variables (FU wave 9)
| Independent variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility | Self-care | Usual activities | Pain/discomfort | Anxiety/depression | |
| Being a current driver (ref.: not being a current driver) | 0.60+ | 0.41* | 0.48* | 0.82 | 0.71 |
| (0.34–1.06) | (0.17–0.98) | (0.26–0.90) | (0.47–1.45) | (0.36–1.39) | |
| Potential confounders | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Constant | 1.10 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 383.85+ | 10.06 |
| (0.00–1897.78) | (0.00–627.10) | (0.00–267.99) | (0.42–348116.32) | (0.01–9160.51) | |
| Observations | 543 | 543 | 543 | 543 | 543 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
Odds ratios were reported; 95% CI in parentheses
Potential confounders include: age, marital status, education, social network, function, and cognitive impairment
To quantify the level of education, the CASMIN classification was used. Lubben Social Network Scale ranges from 0 to 30, with higher values reflecting more social networks and more social support; Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale was used to quantify function, ranging from 0 (worst score) to 8 (best score); Global Deterioration Scale was used to quantify cognitive impairment, ranging from 1 (best score) to 7 (worst score)
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, +p < 0.10