INTRODUCTION
Early childhood is a sensitive period for healthy weight development, and is an important determinant of obesity risk across the life course.1,2 Thus, early childhood is a critical window for obesity prevention,3 with particular opportunity for reducing Indigenous American Indian (AI) disparities.4 By the age of 2, the average AI child will outweigh their white peer, and this excess weight usually persists into kindergarten.3 Disparities are particularly pervasive within rural AI communities.5
The causes of AI obesity disparities are multi-factorial, which has important implications for early childhood obesity prevention programs in tribal communities. Political, structural, and economic pathways influence community food access, learned food preferences, and loss of traditional foodways.6 Nationally, one out of four AI households experience food insecurity7 with many tribal communities reporting even higher rates.8–10 AI families with children are disproportionately affected by food insecurity10 and commonly report poor access to fresh fruits and vegetables and a heavy reliance on energy-dense, commodity foods to feed their families.11 Although studies are limited, poor food access may contribute to obesity disparities among AI adults,8 and may also negatively influence fruit and vegetable food preferences among AI families with young children.10 The Indigenous food sovereignty movement is a grass-roots community organizing movement that emphasizes mobilization of tribal resources to reclaim food systems.12 It promotes active participation in food harvesting at the individual, family, community, and regional levels as a strategy to protect cultural heritage, promote health, and ensure food security.13
Early Childcare and Education Centers (ECEs) are long-recognized as an important environmental influence on learned eating behaviors. Several ECE obesity programs have been successfully implemented in urban schools,14,15 many serving Hispanic and black youth, yet there is little information available for rural AI communities, where tribes often operate their own ECEs. Implemented in tribal ECEs, the “Food Resource Equity and Sustainability for Health (FRESH)” study aimed to improve vegetable intake, food security, and body composition of preschool-aged children and their families. Comprised of child, parent, and ECE environmental interventions, this longitudinal randomized-control study was designed to advance Indigenous food sovereignty within the Osage Nation, a rural reservation community in Oklahoma. Here, we describe the processes used to develop, implement, and evaluate the preschool curriculum component designed to increase children’s exposures to vegetables as a pathway toward learned food preferences for these foods.
FRESH Study Overview
The FRESH study used a community-based participatory research process that involved Osage Nation tribal leaders from the early childhood education and agricultural sectors in every aspect of the research, from the development of the research questions and study implementation to the data collection, analysis, and dissemination of the findings. As one element of a multi-component intervention for ECE families, the FRESH preschool curriculum was accompanied by a school menu best practices redesign16 and a supplemental teacher training on responsive feeding practices17 described elsewhere. Intervention ECE school menus incorporated local, fresh, and culturally-tailored foods from the tribe’s newly launched farm. A complementary, parent-focused, 16-week hybrid curriculum was delivered via a combination of weekly online learning modules and monthly in-person family nights. These family nights featured Indigenous foods and food sovereignty activities to promote community awareness and collective efficacy for a more equitable and sustainable tribal food system. All participating families included one or more members who self-identified as American Indian. The FRESH study was approved by the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Participatory Adaptation of the FRESH Preschool Curriculum
We adapted the FRESH preschool curriculum through a series of meetings with Osage leadership and teachers over a period of 6 months. Members of the academic team completed tours of the schools, discussed existing curricula with teachers, and reviewed pre-existing school-based gardening curricula. As an outcome of these early meetings, the FRESH preschool curriculum was ultimately informed by 2 pre-existing preschool-gardening curricula. First piloted in New Hampshire, the original Early Sprouts™ curriculum spans 24-weeks through 6-week cycles to illustrate the 4 growing seasons, with each weekly cycle featuring 1 of 6 target vegetables.18 This curriculum was the primary source for the adapted FRESH preschool curriculum. Piloted in North Carolina, Watch Me Grow19 involved a crop-a-month structured curriculum spanning 4 months. We added elements from this second curriculum to supplement the teacher’s manual, primarily classroom discussion questions and introductory reading activities.
Before developing the FRESH preschool curriculum, 2 members of the research team reviewed the Early Sprouts™ implementation resource manual (EB, MSW)18 and 1 member who led the adaptation completed the corresponding 10-hour online training program (EB). The FRESH preschool curriculum preserved fidelity to Early Sprouts™ by retaining a combination of sensory exploration, gardening, classroom cooking, and take-home recipe kits to promote family involvement. All of these activities are theoretically designed to help young children overcome innate neophobia for vegetables. In our discussions with teachers, we prioritized maintaining fidelity to the intervention and focused on making adapations when necessary in the delievery of the intervention rather than core elements of the content. For example, we discussed the availability and comfort level of teachers in conducting selected gardening activities that supported the curricula delivery and what supports needed to be in place for the teachers to successfully implement the curricula. Additional factors including vegetable cost and regional availability in this reservation setting were also an important consideration, and ultimately the FRESH preschool curriculum was adapted to span 15-weeks through 3, 5-week cycles (Explore, Sprout, and Harvest).
The primary adaptations included replacement of swiss chard with spinach and green beans with butter (lima) beans, while retaining tomatoes, bell peppers, carrots, and butternut squash target vegetables from the original Early Sprouts™ curriculum. Butter beans and squash were combined into a single weekly module to introduce children to Three Sisters, a traditional indigenous approach for growing these two crops with corn.20 Inspired by Watch Me Grow19, we added an introductory activity (e.g., book or song) for the first 5 weeks to introduce the children to the vegetable of the week in an engaging and interactive way, including discussion questions for teachers before, during, and after each reading. A unique storytelling activity included an introduction to Three Sisters. Additionally, 5 of the 15 recipes for in-class preparation and take-home kits were modified to integrate spinach and butter beans and simplified cooking methods. Recipes were taste tested among a sample of teachers prior to finalization. Esteemed tribal elders fluent in Osage language contributed translations for the names of target vegetables (e.g., is
“carrot”) and other gardening terms (e.g., is
“garden”). See Supplementary File for summary of adaptations and translated words.
Teacher Training & Classroom Implementation
Prior to implementation, all teachers received a 3-hour training in July 2017 on the beta version of the adapted preschool curriculum including a step-by-step manual, which also provided one final opportunity for teacher feedback. An essential part of the training prioritized importance of fostering a student’s willingness to try over the actual eating of vegetables. This was achieved by training teachers to role model willingness to try and to encourage students less willing to try vegetables to explore with their other senses (sight, feel, smell, sound). Example teacher response scripts for reluctant students were included for teacher reference. Teachers were also trained to ask the question of whether or not each student liked the vegetable ‘a lot’, ‘a little’, or ‘not yet’18 upon conclusion of each weekly sensory and cooking activity.
The teacher’s manual also included supplemental information with each lesson (e.g., pictures identifying the parts of vegetable plants and basic nutrition information) to support teacher confidence in curriculum implementation regardless of his or her background. The final written curriculum was later distributed to all participating classrooms in January 2018 during a “recap” training delivered to 38 teachers and aids immediately prior to implementation. Curriculum implementation boxes were also provided to create a classroom environment that stimulated food learning. Example items included vegetable-themed toys and chef-dress up costumes, as well as items required for teaching specific activities, such as vegetable-themed book, magnifying glasses, and child gardening supplies. Each week, classrooms were provided with food ingredients needed to complete sensory and in-classroom cooking activities, as well as prepared take-home kits for children to prepare each week’s recipe again at home with their families. During the study’s intervention phase (January and May 2018), 13 classrooms implemented the curriculum across 5 ECE sites owned and operated by the Osage Nation (2–4 classrooms per site). Since the curriculum involved outdoor gardening activities, demonstration gardens were built for each participating ECE site.
Evaluation
Upon concluding each weekly lesson, teachers completed an implementation survey to evaluate fidelity to the preschool curriculum and how it was received by teachers and students. Overall implementation each week was high across all 15 weeks. All classrooms reported completing each weekly reading activity during the first 5 weeks. Completion of sensory activities ranged from 100%−84.6% and completion of cooking activities ranged from 100%−76.9% across classrooms (Table 1).
Table 1.
Process Evaluation Results for the FRESH Curriculum (n=13 classrooms)
| Week | Introductory Reading | Sensory Activity1 | Cooking Activity | Overall Class Response to Recipe Taste2,3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Activity Completion (n=# classrooms) | Enjoyed or Neutral (n=# classrooms) | |||
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 69.2 (9) |
| 2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 38.5 (5) |
| 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 69.2 (9) |
| 4 | 100 | 100 | 84.6 (11) | 45.5 (5) |
| 5 | 100 | 84.6 (11) | 92.3 (12) | 61.5 (8) |
| 6 | -- | 100 | 84.6 (11) | 81.2 (9) |
| 7 | -- | 92.3 (12) | 92.3 (12) | 41.7 (5) |
| 8 | -- | 100 | 100 | 61.5 (8) |
| 9 | -- | 92.3 (12) | 76.9 (10) | 60.0 (6) |
| 10 | -- | 100 | 100 | 76.9 (10) |
| 11 | -- | 100 | 100 | 76.9 (10) |
| 12 | -- | 100 | 92.3 (12) | 54.5 (6) |
| 13 | -- | 92.3 (12) | 92.3 (12) | 50.0 (6) |
| 14 | -- | 91.7 (12) | 91.7 (11) | 72.7 (8) |
| 15 | -- | 100 | 100 | 76.9 (10) |
For weeks 11–15, completion of sensory activities includes indoor, outdoor, or both
Teacher observed assessment of children’s overall liking of the recipe. Originally measured as overall enjoyed, neutral, mixed, or disliked. % reported represents enjoyed and neutral combined.
Percentages are adjusted for classrooms who completed the cooking activity.
Teachers were also asked to provide written, open-ended feedback each week about real world implementation of the project (Figure 1). Thematic review of qualitative survey responses indicated that children particularly enjoyed activities involving cutting with the knives and cutting boards, as well as mystery bags (paper bags that contained the weekly vegetable). Teachers organically wove FRESH curricula together with other lessons, including repurposing a fruit can as a pen holder to demonstrate repurposing and hanging aprons on the clothesline to dry as part of lessons about clothing. Noted challenges included the need for 2 teachers to help implement lessons and sometimes not having adequate time to prepare for the lesson or deliver the full lesson. Classroom cooking plans were sometimes altered as a result, including asking the school cook to prepare the recipe for student tasting, or students prepared the recipe, but did not get to taste the final product in the classroom. Areas for improvement included a need for more flexibility with the curriculum (e.g., shorter lessons or being able to split activities into smaller components). Teachers suggested use of time-lapsed videos of plants growing.
Figure 1. Qualitative examples of curriculum implementation and teacher feedback.


Photo Credit: Osage Nation Communications Department
LESSONS LEARNED & PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY WITHIN THE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT
Evaluation of the FRESH curriculum indicates it can be implemented successfully in ECE classrooms, so long as adequate support is provided to teachers. Flexibility in delivering the curriculum proved essential, especially for the multi-age ECE classroom setting. Tailoring the curriculum to local AI cultural traditions supported community interest and participation in the program, as demonstrated by families sharing photos of themselves preparing their take-home meal kits. Future curriculum refinements could include modifications to lesson plans to allow for flexibility in weekly implementation and provision of pre-portioned classroom recipe kits for easier preparation in the classroom by teachers and students. The impact of the curriculum on food security, vegetable intake, and body composition will be described in a forthcoming manuscript.
Since its original implementation, the FRESH Children’s Gardens and classroom curriculum have become an integral component within ECE settings within the Osage Nation. To optimize use of raised bed growing space, vegetables have since been modified through school cook and teacher input. Current planting design includes tomatoes, potatoes, bell peppers, onions for spring planting and radish, spinach, beets, and mixed lettuce for fall planting. Harvested produce is first utilized by ECE school kitchens and excess produce is distributed through the Elder Nutrition Program to Osage elders as part of a broadening effort to foster tribal resilience and community health. The Osage Nation has incorporated lessons learned from this study into a new and expanded Community Supported Agriculture program that will be launched in Spring 2021 and provide farm produce weekly to more AI families across the Osage Nation. Collectively, these food knowledge, production, and access initiatives support the goal of creating a more food secure, food sovereign tribal nation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge and thank the members of the FRESH Study Executive Committee and all who participated in the project, too numerous to mention, but including: Assistant Chief Raymond RedCorn, David Webb, Michelle Harding, Melvina Prather, Denise Keene, Dana Daylight, Helen Brumley, Shane Rencountre, Margaret Sisk, Jason George and Jann Hayman. We would like to thank Ms. Gail Boe for leadership in initiating preliminary intervention work. We thank Robynn Rulo for her leadership in implementing this study within the schools. We thank all study participants for their time, knowledge shared and for their continued commitment to their children’s health and wellbeing.
Funding and Institutional Review Board Approval
The study was funded by the National Institutes on Minority Health and Health Disparities (5R01MD011266-03) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences. The Osage Nation congress provided study oversight and tribal approval of the study. The contents of this publication are solely the authors’ responsibility and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NHLBI or the NIH. The funding agency did not participate in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Marianna S. Wetherill, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Hudson College of Public Health.
Emily E. Bourque, Private Practice Dietitian, Tampa, Fl. Affiliation at time of the research: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Dietetic Internship program..
Tori Taniguchi, Center for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences – Tulsa, 700 N. Greenwood Ave, Tulsa, OK 74106.
Charlotte V. Love, School of Health Care Administration, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 W. 117th St, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74117. Affiliation at time of the research: Center for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences – Tulsa, 700 N. Greenwood Ave, Tulsa, OK 74106..
Margaret Sisk, Osage Nation, Harvest Land, 100 W. Main, Ste. 307, Pawhuska, OK, 74056.
Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan, Center for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences – Tulsa, 700 N. Greenwood Ave, Tulsa, OK 74106.
References
- 1.Dixon B, Peña MM, Taveras EM. Lifecourse approach to racial/ethnic disparities in childhood obesity. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md) 2012;3:73–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lucas A Programming by early nutrition in man. In: Bock G, Whelan J, eds. The Childhood Environment and Adult Disease. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1991:38–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Isong IA, Richmond T, Avendaño M, Kawachi I. Racial/Ethnic Disparities: a Longitudinal Study of Growth Trajectories Among US Kindergarten Children. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2018;5:875–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schell LM, Gallo MV. Overweight and obesity among North American Indian infants, children, and youth. American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council 2012;24:302–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.James CV MR, Wilson-Frederick SM, Hall JE, Penman-Aguilar A, Bouye K. Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities Among Rural Adults — United States, 2012–2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jernigan VBB, Salvatore AL, Styne DM, Winkleby M. Addressing food insecurity in a Native American reservation using community-based participatory research. Health Educ Res 2012;27:645–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jernigan VBB, Huyser KR, Valdes J, Simonds VW. Food Insecurity Among American Indians and Alaska Natives: A National Profile Using the Current Population Survey–Food Security Supplement. J Hunger Environ Nutr 2017;12:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jernigan VBB, Wetherill MS, Hearod J, et al. Food Insecurity and Chronic Diseases Among American Indians in Rural Oklahoma: The THRIVE Study. Am J Public Health 2017;107:441–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sowerwine J, Mucioki M, Sarna-Wojcicki D, Hillman L. Reframing food security by and for Native American communities: a case study among tribes in the Klamath River basin of Oregon and California. Food Security 2019;11:579–607. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bauer KW, Widome R, Himes JH, et al. High Food Insecurity and Its Correlates Among Families Living on a Rural American Indian Reservation. Am J Public Health 2012;102:1346–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Finegold K Background report on the use and impact of food assistance programs on Indian reservations (No. 4): US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jernigan VBB. Health and Social Issues of Native American Women In: Joe JR, Gachupin FC, eds. Addressing food security and food sovereignty in Native American communities. Santa Barbara: Praeger; 2012:113–32. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Indigenous Food Sovereignty. ND. (Accessed July 7, 2020, at https://www.indigenousfoodsystems.org/food-sovereignty.)
- 14.Yin Z, Parra-Medina D, Cordova A, et al. Míranos! Look at us, we are healthy! An environmental approach to early childhood obesity prevention. Child Obes 2012;8:429–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Natale RA, Messiah SE, Asfour LS, Uhlhorn SB, Englebert NE, Arheart KL. Obesity Prevention Program in Childcare Centers: Two-Year Follow-Up. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2017;31(6):502–510. doi: 10.1177/0890117116661156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sisson SB, Sleet K, Rickman R, Love C, Williams M, Jernigan VBB. The development of child and adult care food program best-practice menu and training for Native American head start programs: The FRESH study. Prev Med Rep 2019;14:100880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sleet K, Sisson SB, Dev DA, et al. The Impact of Responsive Feeding Practice Training on Teacher Feeding Behaviors in Tribal Early Care and Education: The Food Resource Equity and Sustainability for Health (FRESH) Study. Curr Dev Nutr 2019;4:23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kalich K, Bauer D, McPartlin D. Early Sprouts: Cultivating Healthy Food Choices in Young Children St Paul, MN: Redleaf Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Namenek Brouwer RJ, Benjamin Neelon SE. Watch Me Grow: A garden-based pilot intervention to increase vegetable and fruit intake in preschoolers. BMC Public Health 2013;13:363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mt. Pleasant J. Food yields and nutrient analyses of the Three Sisters: A Haudenosaunee cropping system. Ethnobiology Letters 2016;7:87–98. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
