Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2021 May 22;31(12):9468–9478. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08053-y

Table 3.

Success rate, image quality, ICC of liver stiffness measurement, and liver stiffness in each fibrosis stage of the 2D and 3D MRE

2D MRE 3D MRE p value
Success rate (n = 296) N/A
 Success 293 (99.0%) 293 (99.0%)
 Failure 3 (1.0%) 3 (1.0%)
Image quality (n = 293) 0.000
 Acceptable 61 (20.8%) 3 (1.0%)
 Excellent 232 (79.2%) 290 (99.0%)
ICC of liver stiffness measurement (n = 293) 0.001
 ICC (95% CI) 0.955 (0.944, 0.964) 0.979 (0.974,0.983)
Liver stiffness of fibrosis stage (kPa) (n = 293)
 No fibrosis (F0, n = 22) 2.48 ± 0.32 2.17 ± 0.28 0.001
 Mild fibrosis (F1, n = 55) 2.73 ± 0.37 2.34 ± 0.30 0.000
 Moderate fibrosis (F2, n = 59) 3.12 ± 0.61 2.65 ± 0.37 0.000
 Advanced fibrosis (F3, n = 65) 4.18 ± 1.09 3.45 ± 0.84 0.000
 Cirrhosis (F4, n = 92) 5.94 ± 1.76 5.03 ± 1.89 0.002

ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; N/A, not applicable